Annotated Bibliography

84 views 10:10 am 0 Comments April 20, 2023

HRMT20024 ‐ Assessment 2 – Annotated Bibliography – Marking Rubric
Note: This is an illustration of the marking criteria that will be used in the Turnitin system. To see your marks on the criteria, open your assessment through Turnitin and
click on the marking criteria button. The markers will provide feedback throughout your assessment in the ‘Grademark’ view in Turnitin. You can access this by clicking on
the small blue pencil icon next to your assessment submission.

Key Criteria Unsatisfactory
(Fail) below 50%		 Satisfactory
(Pass) 50 – 64%		 Good
(Credit) 65 – 74%		 Exceeds Expectations
(Distinction) 75 ‐ 84%		 Exceeds Expectations
(High Distinction) 85‐100%
Selected articles 15% Utilises sources that are not
sufficient in quantity and
quality.		 Utilises 4 sources that are of
current and somewhat
related to themes discussed
in this unit.		 Utilises 4 sources that are
current and related to themes
discussed in this unit.		 Utilises 4 very good sources that
are current, credible, and
related to themes discussed in
this unit.		 Utilises 4 excellent sources that are
current, from credible sources and
highly related to themes discussed
in this unit.
Identification of
Research aims and
methods
30%		 The assessment fails to
provide any clear evidence
of the ideas presented		 The assessment provides
limited detail with no clear
summary of the ideas
presented		 The assessment presents a
somewhat detailed and
focused summary of the ideas
presented		 The assessment presents a fairly
detailed and focused summary
of the ideas presented		 The assessment presents a detailed
and focused summary of the ideas
presented, demonstrating a high‐
level ability to identify HRM
strategies and practices
Presentation of
findings and
conclusions and link
to essay 3 30%		 Little or no argument or little
relevance to the HRM issues
in Assessment 3, and little or
no identification of the
issues for your selected
sector.		 Weak argument and no
discussion of the
contemporary HRM issues in
Assessment 3, and/or limited
identification of the issues
for your selected sector		 Some argument about the
value of each article to the
contemporary HRM issues
Assessment 3 topic and good
identification of the issues for
your selected sector		 Strong argument about the
value of each article to the
contemporary HRM issues in
Assessment 3 topic and very
good identification of the issues
for your selected sector		 Excellent and logical argument
about the value of each article to
the contemporary HRM issues in
Assessment 3 topic, and excellent
identification of the issues for your
selected sector
Presentation and
quality of writing
25%		 Quality of writing is at a very
poor standard so barely
understandable.
Many spelling mistakes.
Little or no evidence of proof
reading.		 Some problems with
sentence structure and
presentation
Frequent grammar,
punctuation and spelling
mistakes. Use of
inappropriate language.		 Quality of writing is of a good
standard.
Few grammar, spelling and
punctuation mistakes.		 Quality of writing is of a high
standard.
Few grammar, spelling and
punctuation mistakes.
.		 Quality of writing at a very high
standard.
Correct grammar, spelling and
punctuation.
Late assessment
penalty		 Penalty for late submission without approval if applicable [‐5% per day × 30 marks = ‐1.5 marks/day]