Formative Assessment

133 views 9:41 am 0 Comments April 24, 2023

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Assessment Brief
Version 2: 20th March, 2023 Page 1 of 6
ASSESSMENT BRIEF 4 – – SRS Presentation

COURSE: Bachelor of Information Technology/Bachelor of Information Technology with a Specialisation
in Cyber Security
Unit: Capstone Project
Unit Code: CPRO306
Type of Assessment: Task 4 – Formative Assessment
Length/Duration: 1 – 3 hrs
Unit Learning
Outcomes addressed:		 1. Critically analyse the methods and techniques used when seeking to
apply information technology at the corporate level
2. Identify and present systematically the requirements for an information
system in a large and complex organisation
3. Design, develop, test, and evaluate an appropriate systems solution
4. Identify and resolve critical technical issues with minimal supervision
5. Work effectively as part of a team in the production of an information
system and related documentation and reports.
Submission Date: Week 6
Assessment Task: Assessment 4 – SRS Presentation
Total Mark: 50
Weighting: 10%
Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally
signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment
Extension Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approved application for other
extenuating circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,
calculated by deduction from the total mark.
For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for each calendar day.
More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy &
Procedures – Student Login Required)

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Assessment Brief
Version 2: 20th March, 2023 Page 2 of 6
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
In this part of the assessment, student needs to demonstrate their project ideas to the class and along with their
Software Requirement Specifications they have prepared for the client. The formal demonstration requires 10 to
15 PowerPoint slides explain the following criteria of their project ideas. They will need to be well prepared and
ready to answers and questions from the audience. Students are required to provide the proof of their work along
with the following:
▪ The project ideas, background, objectives, and purposes of the project
▪ Project scopes, deliverables
▪ Team and team performances of the specific tasks
▪ Work breakdown structures, schedule, or the Gantt chart to carry out the WBS
▪ Requirement analysis using the use case diagram
▪ Case definition, functional and non-functional requirements
▪ Budget and the financial breakdown
▪ Database structures, ERD and DFD
▪ User storyboard
▪ Test cases and the Test plan
▪ Risks and Risks management
▪ Communication plan
▪ Your responses on the feedback from your Lecturer
Note: this is a group work and during the presentation all the group members must present their parts.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Assessment Brief
Version 2: 20th March, 2023 Page 3 of 6
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): FOR GROUP ASSIGNMENT

Marking
Criteria		 Fail
(0-49% of the
criterion
mark)		 Pass
(50-64% of
the criterion
mark)		 Credit
(65-74% of
the criterion
mark)		 Distinction
(75-84% of
the criterion
mark)		 High Distinction
(85-100% of
the criterion
mark)
Criterion -1 (5 mark)
Project
Description		 (Not attempted) N
description of project
ideas, background,
objectives, and
purposes of the
project, Project scope
deliverables		 Generally presented
the project ideas,
background,
objectives, and
purposes of the
project, Project scope
deliverables		 Presented the project
ideas, background,
objectives, and
purposes of the
project, Project scope
deliverables		 Clearly presented the
project ideas,
background,
objectives, and
purposes of the
project, Project scope
deliverables		 Clearly and
specifically
presented
the project ideas,
background,
objectives, and
purposes of the
project,
Project scopes,
Criterion-2 (5 mark)
Team cohesiveness		 No team and team
performances
demonstrated		 Presented little bit of
team and team
performances, divide
few of the tasks amo
the team members		 Presented some of the
teamwork and team
performances, divided
some tasks among the
team members		 Almost presented
the
team and team
performances, divide
almost all the tasks
among the team
members		 Completely
presented
the team and team
performances,
divided
all the specific tasks
among the team
Criterion-3
(10 marks)
Requirement analy		 Did not attempt any o
the requirement
gathering, Work
breakdown
structures,
schedule, or the
Gantt
chart, Case definition,
functional and non
functional
requirements.		 Attempted presenting
the techniques for
the
requirement
gathering
and analysing using
the use case diagram,
Work breakdown
structures, schedule,
the Gantt chart to
carry
out the WBS, Case
definition, functional
and non-functional
requirements		 Generally presented
the techniques for
the requirement
gathering
and analysing using
the use case
diagram, Work
breakdown structures
schedule, or the
Gantt
chart to carry out the
WBS, Case definition,
functional and non
functional requiremen		 Specifically
presented
the techniques for
the
requirement
gathering
and analysing using
the use case diagram,
Work breakdown
structures, schedule,
the Gantt chart to
carry
out the WBS, Case
definition, functional
and non-functional		 Specifically, and
clearly presented the
techniques for the
requirement
gathering
and analysing using
the use case diagram
Work breakdown
structures, schedule,
the Gantt chart to
carry
out the WBS, Case
definition, functional
and non-functional
requirements

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Assessment Brief
Version 2: 20th March, 2023 Page 4 of 6

Criterion-4
(20 marks)
Database design
completed and cited		 Not designed any of
the Database
requirement, Entity
Relationship Diagram
(ERD) & Class
Diagram, Tables,
Data Flow Diagrams
(DFD)
No evidence that you
have implemented
the data encryption
and anonymization
of data		 Has attempted few
Database requirement,
Entity Relationship
Diagram (ERD) & Class
Diagram, Tables, Data
Flow Diagrams (DFD)
Little evidence that
you have
implemented the data
encryption
and anonymization of
data		 Has attempted some
of the Database
requirement, Entity
Relationship Diagram
(ERD) & Class Diagram,
Tables, Data Flow
Diagrams (DFD)
Some evidence that
you have
implemented the data
encryption and
anonymization of data		 Clearly and
Professionally
designed almost all th
Database requirement,
Entity Relationship
Diagram (ERD) & Class
Diagram, Tables, Data
Flow Diagrams (DFD)
Most evidence that
you have
implemented the
data encryption and
anonymization of data		 Clearly and
Professionally
designed all the
Database requirement,
Entity Relationship
Diagram (ERD) & Class
Diagram, Tables, Data
Flow Diagrams (DFD)
Adequate and clear
evidence that you
have implemented
the data encryption
and anonymization of
data
Criterion-5 (10 marks
User interface		 Did not attempt the
user storyboards,
sections, contents to
be included, links,
images
placeholders		 Attempted presenting
few user storyboards,
sections, contents to
be included, links,
images
placeholders		 Generally presented
the user storyboards,
sections, contents to
be included, links,
images
placeholders		 Presented almost all
the user storyboards,
sections, contents to
be
included, links, images
placeholders		 Presented all the user
storyboards, sections,
contents to be
included, links, images
placeholders
Criterion-6
(5 marks)
Testing		 Testing plan has not
been attempted		 Testing plan has
mentioned using few
test cases and test
plan		 General testing plan
has been mentioned
using basic test cases
and test plan		 Adequate testing plan
has been mentioned
using almost all the
test cases and test
plan		 Adequate testing plan
has been mentioned
using all the test cases
and test plan
Criterion-7 (5 marks)
Risks and
communication		 No Risks identified Planned to identify
few risks and how to
minimise and how to
communicate with the
stakeholders		 Generally planned to
identify some risks
and how to minimise
and how to
communicate with the
stakeholders		 Adequately planned to
identify almost all the
risks and how to
minimise and how to
communicate with the
stakeholders		 Adequately planned to
identify all risks and
how to minimise and
how to communicate
with the stakeholders

Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Assessment Brief
Version 2: 14th November, 2022 Page 5 of 6
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION
A written assignment undertaken in groups of three or four students in the form of a report addressing a selected
topic related to abovementioned project. This assessment is a group project/activity and students are required
to work with their respective groups. No individual submission will be accepted. You will not receive any marks
for this assignment if your group members collectively report against you for non-participation or noncooperation. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignment submission. Only
one submission is accepted for each group.
The assignment must be submitted online in Moodle. All materials MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft
Word format. Other formats (e.g., pdf or MAC file) may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any
assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in MS
Word. No paper based or hardcopy submission will be accepted.
Our Academic Learning Support (ALS) team would be happy to help you with understanding the task and all other
assessment-related matters. For assistance and to book one-on-one meeting please email one of our ALS
coordinators (Sydney [email protected]; Melbourne [email protected] ). For online help and support
please click the following link and navigate Academic Learning Support in Moodle.
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/course/view.php?id=5
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and
demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student
must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you
refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System
(Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks
and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each
Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise
specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any
paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard
Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task
in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is
generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,
chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not
the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own
research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Assessment Brief
Version 2: 14th November, 2022 Page 6 of 6
references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before
preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism
through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link:
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located
in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online
dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but
should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.
Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as
government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC),
or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and
government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly
very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites
(Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw
(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).