1
Individual Assessment
Cover page
Unit Details |
Name | Organizational Behaviour |
Code | HC1052 | |
Year, Trimester | 2023, Trimester 1 |
Assessment Details |
Name | Individual assessment |
Due Date and Week | 5th / May/ 2023, Week 7 |
Individual Student Details |
Student Number |
First Name | |
Family Name |
Submission Declaration |
Integrity Declaration | I have read and understand academic integrity policies and practices and my assessment does not violate these. |
Full Name | ||
Submission Date |
2
Instructions
Academic Integrity Information |
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or cancellation of course enrolment. |
Format Instructions |
• Most assessments must be in MS Word format with no spacing, 11-pt Calibri font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • You must name your file with the Unit Code and Student ID (e.g. “HC1052- GWA1995”). • Check that you submit the correct document as special consideration is not granted if you make a mistake. • Student ID needs to be indicated on the cover page. |
Penalties | • All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time along with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing. |
Essay Topic/Scenario
Imagine that you are a manager in a fast food restaurant located near a busy train station in the city.
You also know that there are many similar restaurants in your city, making it a competitive business.
You recognise that providing high quality, quick and friendly service and having actively engaged
employees is going to make the difference between your restaurant’s success and failure. Your
management team decides to first address employee job satisfaction as a key driver of high-quality
customer service.
Task Requirements
First step, based on your knowledge of OB, think about what your restaurant can do to promote job
satisfaction of your employees. Your management team next decides that it will be important to address
the causes of job dissatisfaction among employees if the restaurant is to succeed.
Second step, identify and discuss any five major outcomes of job dissatisfaction.
Third step, think about what your restaurant can do to minimise the occurrence of destructive employee
responses to dissatisfaction.
Fourth step, identify your top three suggestions/recommendations for the restaurant to succeed.
3
Fifth step, find a minimum of five (5) peer-reviewed academic articles from Google Scholar and
ProQuest research database which provide evidence/support the main ideas you have determined from
your reading. Note: students who cite relevant peer-reviewed academic articles in the ‘Adaptive Harvard
Referencing’ requirements may achieve higher marks than those who do not cite relevant materials in
the required referencing requirements. If you’re in doubt about what is a peer-reviewed academic article
please ask your tutor in the interactive tutorial sessions or the unit coordinator in the drop-in sessions.
Write your Response/Comprehension
• Write an introduction (describe the purpose of the essay and the main points you will be
covering).
• Compose 3-4 body paragraphs (minimum 300 words each).
• Write a conclusion.
• The document must be typed in MS Word using an appropriate font (e.g. Times New Roman,
Helvetica, Cambria or Arial (size 12 pt, 1.5 line spacing and left aligned).
Students are advised to read a wide range of scholarly materials in addition to the lecture slides.
What goes in an introduction?
This paragraph introduces the purpose of your analytical essay. Within the introductory paragraph, you
will need to introduce the topic of your essay and highlight the key topics you will address in subsequent
paragraphs of this essay.
How do I write body paragraphs?
Each paragraph has one main point or topic. A good paragraph needs a clear topic sentence to state
the purpose of this paragraph. Then you will write 3-4 statements elaborating on that point using
citations (in-text references) to attribute ideas to journal articles you read. Your analysis should
demonstrate critical thinking based on research, not just your opinion. Please paraphrase your ideas
from journal articles rather than using quotations.
What goes in a conclusion?
The conclusion is not a restatement of the introduction. Instead, it must briefly summarise the key points
in the body paragraphs and leave the reader with a clear message(s).
What about references?
Your list of references do not count towards word limit, but in-text citations do. The referencing
format for both the in-text referencing and reference list is the Adapted Harvard Referencing style.
Please see the Adapted Harvard referencing style on p. 7 and ProQuest login in the additional
resources folder in Blackboard.
4
Marking Criteria
Marking Criteria | Weighting |
Embark + Clarity | 4 |
Find + Generate | 3 |
Evaluate + Reflect | 3 |
Organise + Manage | 3 |
Analyse + Synthesise | 3 |
Communicate + Apply | 4 |
Total Weight | 20% |
5
Marking Rubric
Criteria | Ratings | Pts. | ||||
Embark + Clarity (Addresses the task requirements) |
3.5-4 Pts. HD Exceptionally clear understanding and ability to address all task requirements and with clear purpose. |
3 Pts. D Strong grasp of understanding and ability to address all task requirements. |
2.5 Pts. CR Competent understanding and ability to address all task requirements. |
2 Pts. PA Some understanding of the task evident but some requirements are missing. |
0-1.9 Pts. NN Lack of understanding of the task requirements and an inability to offer structured directions from researching. |
4 |
Find + Generate | 3 Pts. HD |
2.5 Pts D |
2 Pts. CR |
1.5 Pts. PA |
0-1.4 Pts. NN |
3 |
(Evidence of research + | ||||||
Harvard referencing format) | Uses refined academic research skills to locate current, credible, accurate and authoritative data/information. Uses Harvard referencing style and in-text citations with no errors. |
Uses academic research skills to locate current, credible and authoritative data/information. Uses Harvard referencing style and in-text citations with minimal errors. |
Uses academic research skills to locate current and credible data/information. Uses Harvard referencing style and in-text citations, with some consistent errors. |
Uses general academic research skills to locate current data/information. Inconsistently applies Harvard referencing style. In-text citations and reference list show multiple errors. |
Does not locate and report data/information from a number of sources across a specified range. The articles sourced do not meet the academic standard required or are not cited or do not have a clear application to the task. |
|
Evaluate + Reflect | 3 Pts. HD |
2.5 Pts. D |
2 Pts CR |
1.5 Pts. PA |
0-1.4 Pts. NN |
3 |
(Articles meet task criteria, is | ||||||
current, relevant, accurate and peer-reviewed) |
Articles selected relate strongly to the purpose of the task, and meet the academic standard required. Strongly support reflection on the essay topic. |
Articles selected relate to the purpose of the task, and meet the academic standard required. Support reflection on the essay topic. |
Articles selected generally relate to the purpose of the task and meet the academic standard required. Support some reflection on the essay topic. |
Articles selected generally relate to the purpose of the task. The articles may not fully meet the academic standard required. Minimal reflection on the essay topic. |
Student has not made connections to the essay topic. Unable to demonstrate satisfactory original reflection on the essay topic. |
|
Organise + Manage | 3 Pts. HD |
2.5 Pts. D |
2 Pts. CR |
1.5 Pts. PA |
0-1.4 Pts. NN |
3 |
(Logical structure of | ||||||
information) | Main ideas clearly outlined. Discussion and analysis organised logically. Cohesive structure- consistently encourages reader |
Main ideas clearly outlined. Discussion and analysis organised logically. Cohesive structure – supports reader engagement |
Main ideas clearly outlined. Information organised mostly logically. Generally |
Main ideas outlined but require more description or explanation. Some logical order in the structure but there is limited |
Main ideas not clearly defined. Information randomly presented. No sense of cohesion between ideas. Inappropriate structure and organisation and information not always coherent nor integrated. |
6
engagement with the content. |
with the content. | cohesive structure aids reader understanding of ideas. |
linking between ideas and information presented. |
|||
Analyse + Synthesise (Critical analysis and synthesis of ideas to produce understanding) |
3 Pts. HD Analysis, critical personal reflection and evaluation are fully integrated effectively to a high standard of performance. |
2.5 Pts. D Analysis and personal reflection are quite well integrated. |
2 Pts. CR Some analysis and attempts at personal reflection. Attempts to synthesise ideas to discuss/analyse the essay topic. |
1.5 Pts. PA Minimal analysis and personal reflection. Some attempts to discuss/analyse the essay topic. Limited integration or synthesis to show understanding of the essay topic. |
0-1.4 Pts. NN Alignment of the key idea with the essay topic and main ideas not outlined clearly. Limited understanding of the essay topic. |
3 |
Communicate + Apply | 3.5-4 Pts. HD Uses discipline specific language to demonstrate understanding from an academic/professional and personal perspective. Writing is fluent and uses appropriate paragraph/sentence structures. |
3 Pts. D Includes discipline specific language. Generally demonstrates understanding from an academic/professional and personal perspective. Some interpretation and application of new knowledge to similar contexts. Writing is generally fluent and uses mostly appropriate paragraph/sentence structures. |
2.5 Pts. CR Some discipline specific language. Attempts to demonstrate understanding from both academic/professional and personal perspectives. Attempted interpretation and application of new knowledge. Writing is generally understandable and uses mostly appropriate paragraph/sentence structures. |
2 Pts. PA Limited vocabulary with little use of discipline specific language. Demonstrates understanding from one perspective. Minimal interpretation or application of new knowledge. Errors are frequent, often making understanding difficult. |
0-1.9 Pts. NN Mostly general vocabulary with an inability to use discipline-specific and academic language. Unable to act as an independent critical thinker. Unsatisfactory attempt to discuss the essay topic. Inability to demonstrate the originality of the solution. |
4 |
7
Holmes Referencing Requirements:
Assessment Design – Adapted Harvard Referencing
Holmes will be implementing as a pilot program a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following guidelines apply:
1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources which provide full text access to the source’s content for lecturers and markers.
2. The Reference list should be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled: References.
3. It should include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged alphabetically A-Z by author surname. In addition, it MUST include a hyperlink to
the full text of the cited reference source.
For example;
Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. and Stein, A. (2004), Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall,
http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf
4. All assignments will require additional in-text reference details which will consist of the surname of the author/authors or name of the authoring
body, year of publication, page number of content, paragraph where the content can be found.
For example;
“The company decided to implement a enterprise wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies (Hawking et al, 2004, p3(4)).”
Non Adherence to Referencing Guidelines
Where students do not follow the above guidelines:
1. Students who submit assignments which do not comply with the guidelines will be asked to
resubmit their assignments.
2. Late penalties will apply, as per the Student Handbook each day, after the student/s have been
notified of the resubmission requirements.
3. Students who comply with guidelines and the citations are “fake” will be reported for
academic misconduct.