Health Promotion Plan - Australia Assignments

NUR134 Assessment 3 Rubric – Health Promotion Plan Overall weighting: 35%

Task: Identify a health issue/concern and provide justification using epidemiological data to explain why this issue/concern is a national health priority.

Analyse the contributing factors for this health issue/concern and map out a health promotion plan to potentially address or mitigate these.

Select one potential health promotion intervention/activity you have identified to describe in detail, including how evaluation of this intervention could be undertaken.

Minimum of 5 academic references to be cited.

Task Length: 1000 words

Criterion Description

Epidemiological data is used to explain why the health issue/concern identified is a national health priority

(Weighting 20%)

• Comprehensive discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority

• Extensive use of epidemiological data to support discussion

• Thorough discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority

• Expansive use of epidemiological data to support discussion

• Detailed discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority

• Broad use of epidemiological data to support discussion

•Basic discussion of why this issue is considered a national health priority

• Incorporates epidemiological data to support discussion

• Unclear why this issue is considered a national health priority

• Epidemiological data is not used support discussion or used ineffectively

Factors that contribute to the health issue/concern identified are analysed, with consideration of relevant social determinants, to develop a health promotion plan in response that will improve health equity.

(Weighting 40%)

• Identification and discussion of numerous factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue

•The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is clearly articulated.

• A minimum of 3 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly relate to key contributing factors

•A minimum of 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are proposed to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter

• Identification and discussion of a range factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue

• The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is clearly articulated.

• A minimum of 3 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly relate to key contributing factors

•A minimum of 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are proposed to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter

• Identification and discussion of several factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue

• The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is clearly articulated.

• A minimum of 3 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly relate to key contributing factors

•A minimum of 2 strategies for health a promotion activity are identified to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter

• Identification and discussion of a few factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue

• The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is articulated.

• A minimum of 2 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly relate to key contributing factors

•A minimum of 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are identified to achieve each objective and appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter

• Limited identification and discussion of factors including relevant social determinants that contribute to the health issue

• The goal for a health promotion response to the health issue is not articulated.

• Less than 2 objectives are developed to achieve the health promotion goal clearly relate to key contributing factors

•Less than 2 strategies for a health promotion activity are identified to achieve each objective and/or are not appropriately linked to an action area of the Ottawa Charter

A detailed summary of a proposed health promotion intervention activity is described, including details of how this activity will be evaluated.

(Weighting 30%)

• Comprehensive discussion explaining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented.

• The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved is thoroughly explained.

• Detailed discussion explaining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented.

• The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved is explained in detail.

• Detailed discussion outlining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented.

• The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved, is broadly explained.

• The discussion outlines how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented.

• The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved, is explained.

• The discussion outlining how one of the strategies proposed would be implemented is unclear or absent.

• The type of evaluation and plan for assessing the success of the implementation of the proposed strategy and how this will be achieved is not clearly explained or inappropriate.

Adhere to academic presentation requirements

(Weighting 10%)

• Demonstrated good planning; with correct spelling and grammar, and appropriate terminology used throughout

• Provided a comprehensive reference list and accurately referenced all sources using the Harvard referencing style

• Demonstrated good planning, with correct spelling and grammar, and appropriate terminology used throughout

• Accurately referenced quality sources using the Harvard referencing style

• Minimal spelling or grammatical errors, and mostly suitable use of terminology

• Accurately referenced sources using the Harvard referencing style

• Some incorrect spelling, grammar and/or terminology

• Some errors in the application of Harvard referencing style

• Did not present information in an academic style, with numerous spelling, grammatical and/or terminology errors

• Used an incorrect referencing style or made a large number of referencing errors.