Risk Management Toolkit

84 views 7:58 am 0 Comments April 5, 2023

TPP12-03c Risk Management Toolkit for the NSW Public Sector: Volume 2
Southland DLE risk register
Note: This register was prepared as at March 2012

ID
A2
A3
Assessment
By: Date
(M/YR):
Exec
Team
3/12
Exec
Team
3/12
Risk description
Government response
to changing
community needs
causes a mismatch
between Southland
DLE’s organisational
capability and new
service delivery
requirements,
resulting in negative
impact on all
Southland DLE
objectives
Ageing and obsolete
IT infrastructure
causes IT systems to
be hacked, resulting
in inappropriate use
and loss of sensitive
information
Impacts
(consequence type)
SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
LEGAL/COMPLIANC
E
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
FINANCIAL
Risk
owner
Comm.
ADG
CS
Worst
case
Current
Residual
Worst
case
Current
Residual
Ratings
C L
V High Likely
Med Likely
V High AC
V High Pos
V High Rare
RISK
Major
Mod
Ex
Major
Mod
Accept
?
No
Yes
No
No
Controls/risk treatment
Description (Owner)
Forward workforce planning
Targeted recruitment strategies
Training matrix for workforce
Review and revision of training
needs (SUP HRM)
Firewall and virus software
User access controls
User ID and password policy
Routine penetration testing
(MAN Exec Res and Inf)
Upgrade IT Systems (ADG CS)
Effect
Yes
No
Yes
Review and reporting
requirements
Review the effectiveness
of the controls through
annual frontline officer and
specialist roles skills audit
Quarterly reporting to the
Executive of progress
against project milestones
and budget
Reporting of firewall
breaches to ADG CS

44

A5
ID Assessment Risk description
By: Date
(M/YR):
A4 Exec
Team
3/12 Findings of
widespread corruption
in other jurisdictions
creates a negative
association for
Southland DLE as a
law enforcement
agency, resulting in
loss of reputation,
heightened scrutiny
and lower internal
morale
Exec
Team
3/12 Questions about the
performance and
effectiveness of
Southland DLE’s
activities raised by the
Parliamentary
Accounts Committee
causes a perception
that the Department
does not present good
value to the
community, resulting
in an adverse impact
to our budget position
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
FINANCIAL
Impacts
(consequence type)
Risk
owner
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
Comm.
Worst
case
Med
Current Low
Residual
ADG CS Worst
case
Current
High
Med
Likely
Likely Mod
Likely Min Yes
Major
Ratings Controls/risk treatment Review and reporting
requirements
C L RISK
Accept
?
Description (Owner) Effect
No
Recruit psychological testing
program, induction program,
governance (incl.
whistleblower) programs (MAN
Educ Serv)
Yes
Quarterly report to the
Executive on reported
incidents of suspected
fraud or corruption, and/or
access to whistleblower
program
No Performance management
systems in place to monitor
outputs against objectives on a
quarterly basis. Performance
measures are reviewed and
updated annually
Executive monitoring of budget
against performance criteria
(crime statistics, road safety,
community measure, etc.)
Twice-yearly assessment to
identify opportunities for
improvement and/or
reallocation of resources (DIR
Strat. Plan.)
Yes Reporting as directed
through the strategic plan,
reporting as directed
through community
performance metrics
Pos Mod Yes
Residual

TPP12-03c Risk Management Toolkit for the NSW Public Sector: Volume 2 45

1.2
ID Assessment Risk description Impacts
(consequence type)
Risk
owner
By: Date
(M/YR):
A6 Exec
Team
3/12 Increasing age of
frontline officers and an
imbalance between
retirements compared
to recruitments causes
a skill shortage across
frontline policing roles,
resulting in the inability
to provide frontline
policing
SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
ADG CS
A7 Exec
Team
3/12 Poor communication
has led to a mismatch
between the
community’s
perception of public
safety and real crime
rates, resulting in a
drop in Southland
DLE’s reputation as
an effective policing
authority
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
ADG
FO
Exec
Team
3/12 Poorly delivered road
safety awareness
campaign causes the
road safety education
program to fail,
resulting in Southland
DLE missing road
safety improvement
targets
SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
ADG RS Worst
case
Current
High
Residual
High
Ratings
C L RISK
Accept
?
Worst
case
V High Likely Major No
Current V High Pos Major No
Residual V High Rare Mod Yes
Worst
case
Med Pos Mod No
Current Med Pos Mod No
Residual Med Rare Min Yes
Pos
Rare
Mod
Mod
No
Yes
Service provider agreement
with performance metrics in
place
Independent program
evaluation to assess
effectiveness
(DIR PA)
Controls/risk treatment Review and reporting
requirements
Description (Owner) Effect
Development of workforce
planning strategy to bring
forward recruitment numbers
and reskill non-frontline officers
to frontline positions
Targeted recruitment strategies
to include socially diverse
groups (SUP HRM)
Yes
Report quarterly to the
Executive on workforce
planning strategy progress
Report quarterly to the
Executive on workforce
retention statistics
Consider and develop incentive
schemes (SUP HRM) Yes
Community education and
communication strategy about
serious crime rates and impact
(DIR PA)
No
Review community
education strategy
annually
Report to the Executive on
communication strategy
performance every six
months
Report to the Executive on
community safety
measures following each
survey
Improve communication of
strategy to stakeholders
Monitor community response
and modify strategy
accordingly
Yes
Yes Review service provider
agreement performance
criteria annually
Report to the Executive
quarterly on road safety
performance statistics

TPP12-03c Risk Management Toolkit for the NSW Public Sector: Volume 2 46

ID Assessment Risk description Impacts
(consequence type)
Risk
owner
Southland DLE’s
inability to fill
specialist analyst
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
By: Date
(M/YR):
2.1 Exec
Team
3/12
cybercrime, to be
overlooked, resulting
in greater community
concern about
potential incidents
roles causes a new or
emerging threat, e.g.
PERFORMANCE
SERVICE
SERVICE
DELIVERY
DISRUPTION
ADG
SO
Current
Residual
V High
V High
Ratings
C L
Worst
case
V High AC
Pos Major RISK Accept
?
Ex No
No Establishment of specialty units
with skill and experience in
emerging threats such as
cybercrime
Develop alliances with national
and international assessment
and investigation bodies (ADG
SO)
Controls/risk treatment
Description (Owner)
Staff access to national training
programs, formal and/or
informal sharing of information
across jurisdictions (ADG SO)
Yes
Effect
Yes
and national/international
alliances
establishing specialty units,
Review and reporting
requirements
Monthly emerging threat
assessment report to the
Executive
Report on progress in
Rare Mod Yes
AC
Major No
3.1 Exec
Team
3/12 Ageing IT
infrastructure causes
Southland DLE’s
communication
systems to fail and
they are non
resulting in the
inability to deliver
effective policing
services to the
community
operational for a
number of hours,
ADG
FO
Worst
case
High
Current High
Residual High Rare
AC
Mod
Major No
Yes Southland DLE Business
Continuation Plan (CRO) No
Reduce the level of risk
through an investment in
upgrading the IT system for
communications (ADG CS)
Yes
failures to ADG Corporate
Services
communication systems
Report on annual BCP
testing
Quarterly reporting to the
Executive on progress
against project milestones
and budget
Reporting of

TPP12-03c Risk Management Toolkit for the NSW Public Sector: Volume 2 47

ID Assessment Risk description Impacts
(consequence type)
The inability to gain
government support
for the policy allowing
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
By: Date
(M/YR):
3.2 Exec
Team
3/12
school crossings
causes greater strain
on frontline policing
resources, resulting in
a reduction in policing
services to the
volunteers to ‘police’
community
Changes in population
demographics across
Southland, which are
SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
ADG FO
Risk
owner
Worst
case
Current
Residual
Med
Med
Ratings
C L
Med AC
Pos
Pos Mod Yes
Mod
RISK
Mod
No
Accept
?
No
Investigate alternative policies
that allow a transfer of school
crossing duties to non
uniformed officers or other
strategies that do not require
changes to legislation
Controls/risk treatment
Description (Owner)
Undertake stakeholder focus
group meetings throughout
affected community (DIR CE)
Yes
Effect
No
Report to the Executive on
alternative strategies
project quarterly
Review and reporting
requirements
Report from project
steering group to the
Executive on status of
3.3 Exec
Team
3/12
strategy, result in
Southland DLE
frontline policing
becoming ineffective
for local communities
DLE’s policing
not considered in
PERFORMANCE
SERVICE
ADG FO Current
Worst
case
Residual
High
High
Med
Pos
Likely
Pos
Mod
Major No
Mod Yes
No Implement mobile policing into
regional areas
Undertake recruitment
programs within socially
diverse groups
Offer incentives for officers to
relocate to regional areas (SUP
HR)
Workforce-planning strategy
assesses socio-demographic
changes in the community
(SUP HR)
Yes
Yes
Executive on workforce
retention statistics
Annual report to the
Executive on Southland’s
demographic mix and
changes by specialist
Report quarterly to the
Executive on workforce
planning strategy progress
Report quarterly to the

TPP12-03c Risk Management Toolkit for the NSW Public Sector: Volume 2 48

ID Assessment Risk description Impacts
(consequence type)
Risk
owner
Ratings Controls/risk treatment
By: Date
(M/YR): C L RISK
Accept ? Description (Owner)
SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
REPUTATION AND
ADG FO
Worst
case
V High Pos Major No
Public education campaign on
emergency and non
emergency numbers
Regular testing of technology
for redirecting calls and
updating as required
Staff training and development
for handling calls
Current Med Pos Mod Yes
Residual
3.4 Exec
Team
3/12 Lack of community
understanding about
the role of the ‘000’
emergency hotline
causes an increase in
non-urgent calls,
resulting in an
increase in
emergency call
receipt times
IMAGE
4.2 Exec
Team
3/12 Insufficient skills and
budget to increase
levels of skilled staff
and retrain staff in
new forensic
SERVICE
PERFORMANCE
REPUTATION AND
IMAGE
increase in challenges
over quality of trial
evidence, poor judicial
outcomes, reduced
morale, and the
inability to attract and
retain incident
investigation and
forensic evidence staff
resulting in an
technology division
causes a failure to
take advantage of
improvements in
forensic technology,
ADG SO
Worst
case
High AC Major No
Current High Likely Major No
Residual High Pos Mod Yes
organisations (DIR
Foren.Inv.Unit)
Resource forensic specialists
and provide training to current
forensic and investigations staff
in leading-edge technologies
(DIR Foren.Inv.Unit)
No
Report to the Executive on
progress in creating and
filling staff specialist roles
Report to the Executive on
strategic partnerships as
they are agreed to
Seek strategic partnerships
with high-performing forensics
Yes
Review and reporting
requirements
Effect
Yes
Report quarterly to the
Executive on call receipt
statistics

TPP12-03c Risk Management Toolkit for the NSW Public Sector: Volume 2 49