Early Childhood Curriculum and Pedagogy

3/30/23, 8:56 AM Preview Rubric: Assessment 3: Journal 2023 – (ECE6006) Early Childhood Curriculum and Pedagogy 2: the Arts – OSP – Victoria …
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1752176&rubricId=542710&originTool=quicklinks 1/6
Assessment 3: Journal 2023
Course: (ECE6006) Early Childhood Curriculum and Pedagogy 2: the Arts – OSP

Criteria

Full Mark

High
Distinction
(HD)

Distinction
(D)

Credit (C)

Pass (P)

Not
Satisfactory
(N)

Criterion
Score

Criteria	Full Mark	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (D)	Credit (C)	Pass (P)	Not Satisfactory (N)	Criterion Score
Criterion 1: Docume ntation of artistic explorati ons	30 points	27 points The student has provided clear, relevant and creative examples of their artistic exploration s t hroughout the course, demonstrat ing a strong ability to explore, play and experiment with the languages of movement, music, drama and visual arts. (24-30 points)	/ 30	22 points The student has provided creative and relevant examples of their artistic exploration s t hroughout the course, showing an ability to explore, play and experiment with the languages of movement, music, drama and visual arts. (21-23.5 points)	19 points The student has provided mostly relevant examples of their artistic exploration s t hroughout the course, showing an ability to explore and play with the languages of movement, music, drama and visual arts. (18-20.5 points)	16 points The student has provided some general examples of their artistic exploration s t hroughout the course, showing a basic ability to explore and play with the languages of movement, music, drama and visual arts. (15-17.5 points)	10 points The student has provided unclear or few examples of their artistic exploration s t hroughout the course. (0-14 points)

Criteria	Full Mark	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (D)	Credit (C)	Pass (P)	Not Satisfactory (N)	Criterion Score
Criterion 2: Discussi on	20 points	18 points The discussion of the artefacts makes strong, highly relevant links to early childhood research and the unit resources, showing that the student can meaningful ly contextuali ze their own artistic practices in early childhood education from personal, social and philosophic al perspectiv es.	/ 20	14 points The discussion of the artefacts makes relevant links to early childhood research and the unit resources, showing that the student can contextuali ze their own artistic practices in early childhood education from personal, social and philosophic al perspectiv es. (14-15.5 points)	12 points The discussion of the artefacts makes mostly relevant links to early childhood research and the unit resources, showing that the student can contextuali ze their own artistic practices in early childhood education from personal, social and philosophic al perspectiv es. (12-13.5 points)	10 points The discussion of the artefacts makes some relevant links to early childhood research and the unit resources, showing that the student can generally contextuali ze their own artistic practices in early childhood education from personal, social and philosophic al perspectiv es. (10-11.5 points)	7 points The discussion does not make relevant connection s between artefacts and early childhood research/u nit resources. There is little or no evidence of student’s ability to contextuali ze their own artistic practice. (0-9.5 points)

Criteria	Full Mark	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (D)	Credit (C)	Pass (P)	Not Satisfactory (N)	Criterion Score
Criterion 3: Implicati ons for practice	/ 20	20 points	18 points The student has meaningful ly applied the languages of music, movement, drama and visual arts to build rich, multidiscipl inary learning experience s that are clearly informed by research and reflection. (16-20 points)	14 points The student has applied the languages of music, movement, drama and visual arts to build multidiscipl inary learning experience s that are informed by research and reflection. (14-15.5 points)	12 points The student has applied the languages of music, movement, drama and visual arts to build multidiscipl inary learning experience s. (12-13.5 points)	10 points The student has generally applied the languages of music, movement, drama and visual arts to build learning experience s, though more considerati on may be required. (10-11.5 points)	7 points The student was unable to apply the languages of music, movement, drama and visual arts to build multidiscipl inary learning experience s. (0-9.5 points)
(16-20 points)

Criteria	Full Mark	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (D)	Credit (C)	Pass (P)	Not Satisfactory (N)	Criterion Score
Criterion 4: Presenta tion of the Digital Visual Journal	20 points	18 points Journal has an appealing, clean and simple layout. Graphical elements are creative and show that the student has considered good design principles. Organisatio n of artefacts and informatio n is clear, logical, appropriat ely sequenced and consistent. (16-20 points)	/ 20	14 points Journal has a clean and simple layout. Graphical elements show that the student has considered good design principles. Organisatio n of artefacts and informatio n is appropriat ely sequenced and consistent. (14-15.5 points)	12 points Journal has a clean and simple layout. Organisatio n of artefacts and informatio n is generally appropriat ely sequenced. (12-13.5 points)	10 points Journal generally has a clean and simple layout, but may be difficult to view at times. Some graphical elements may be distracting or confusing. Organisatio n of artefacts is mostly appropriat ely sequenced, but may be confusing in parts. (10-11.5 points)	7 points Journal is difficult to view or engage with. Graphical elements are distracting or confusing. Organisatio n of artefacts is not clear or consistent; details may be missing. (0-9.5 points)

Criteria	Full Mark	High Distinction (HD)	Distinction (D)	Credit (C)	Pass (P)	Not Satisfactory (N)	Criterion Score
Criterion 5: In text citations and referenc e list	10 points	9 points Citing/Refe rencing is accurate and consistent in relation to Harvard convention s. (8-10 points)	/ 10	7 points Citing/Refe rencing is accurate and consistent in relation to Harvard convention s. May include one or two slight errors. (7 points)	6 points Citing/Refe rencing is mostly accurate in relation to Harvard convention s. May include a few errors. (6 points)	5 points Citing/Refe rencing is partially complete or includes several errors. (5 points)	3 points Citing/Refe rencing is either not evident or contains significant errors. (0-4 points

Hight Distinction
85 points minimum
Distinction
70 points minimum
Credit
60 points minimum
Pass
50 points minimum
Not Satisfactory
0 points minimum