RESEARCH GUIDELINES

98 views 9:25 am 0 Comments March 25, 2023

FALL 2021
MARKETING 1 (MKTG19439)
MAJOR PROJECT
PROJECT COMPONENTS
This project consists of 4 parts:
• Group Contract (2%)
• Group Industry Analysis (10%)
• Individual Brand Analysis (15%)
• Individual Presentation (8%)
RESEARCH GUIDELINES
You will search CREDIBLE sources on the internet and use online academic databases provided
through Sheridan Library. Use the Marketing 1 Research Guide
(
http://sheridancollege.libguides.com/Marketing1) to get started with your research. You can ask
the Library for assistance with research including searching online, using academic databases,
locating industry and company information, and APA formatting.
This project requires students to create a SWOT analysis. Students must research internal facts and
external trends and put this information into the appropriate categories. You may NOT use a premade SWOT or analysis that someone else published on the internet. These sources include, but are
not limited to the Sheridan Library databases, SlideShare, MBA Skool, PESTLE analysis, scribd,
freeswotanalysis.com, Study Moose, and Marketing 91. Use of these sources is considered a Breach of
Academic Integrity.
This project requires students to create a 4Ps analysis. Students must research product, price, place
and promotion from multiple credible courses and put this information together. You may NOT use a
pre-made 4Ps analysis that someone else published on the internet. This is considered a Breach of
Academic Integrity.
All information and data must be paraphrased. You may not use quotes or quotations. This is
considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
You may not use Wikipedia as a source. This is considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
APA REFERENCES
Detailed secondary research that is properly cited; in-depth analysis and professional
documentation/presentation are essential. Use the APA Citation Guide
(
http://sheridancollege.libguides.com/citation_guide) to properly cite those sources.
You must include an in-text citation after each point that you are listing in your report. This citation
should include the author of the publication, the date of publication and the page number where the
information you have included can be found. An example is (Smith, 2005, p. 57).
You must also include a complete reference list (on a separate page) at the end of your report which
includes a list of all of the articles you have used in your report in alphabetical order. Here are two
examples of what a reference list entry should look like:
From Marketing magazine website:
Jones, F. (2004, October 14). Trends in Advertising.
Marketing Magazine. Retrieved from
www.marketingmag.ca
From academic database:
Warren, M. (2007). Do celebrity endorsements still work? Campaign, p.13. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/227461444?accountid=3455
PROJECT SCENARIO
Here is an example of a situation that you should consider when approaching this project:
Imagine that you have just graduated from the marketing diploma program at Sheridan, and you have
been hired as a marketing support person with the Nestlé company. You are working with brands
such as Perrier and Pure Life in the marketing department.
Your manager wants you to familiarize yourself with the bottled water market. He/she wants you to
become familiar with trends in this market and the marketing activities of the various companies.
Your manager wants you to report your findings in the form of a presentation.
Your analysis should focus on the Canadian/North American market.
INSTRUCTIONS
You will be assigned to a group of 4 students.
Choose an industry from the list attached in Appendix A (the bottled water market situation
discussed earlier is just an example). Your professor must approve your selection.
Meet with your group to establish rules for working together.
Go to the Marketing 1 Research Guide. Become familiar with the tabs and the information available.
Complete the Group Contract provided in SLATE and submit it before the due date.
Industries and brands will be confirmed by your professor.
Please read the rubrics for all project components. This will give you a clear idea of expectations and
requirements.

GROUP INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
A scan of the Marketing Environment is an essential step in developing any marketing strategy or plan.
You need to understand the customers, trends, the competition and the external factors that may impact
decisions.
Reference Chapter 2 in the textbook for an overview of each environmental force that you will research
for your report.
Research
In order to complete your Industry Environmental Scan, you will want to conduct a significant amount of
secondary research using the internet and the Sheridan databases. Use the Marketing 1 Research Guide.
Although this is a group project, each group member is expected to find at least 6 references for
this report. Each group member will submit their 6 references with the assignment.
You are expected to have at least 4 trends in each category.
Only include references that are current within the last 3 years.
Students must research external trends and put this information into the appropriate categories.
You may NOT use a pre-made SWOT or analysis that someone else published on the internet.
These sources include, but are not limited to the Sheridan Library databases, SlideShare, MBA
Skool, PESTLE analysis, scribd, freeswotanalysis.com, Study Moose, and Marketing 91. This is
considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
Instructions
Your report should cover Demographic, Socio-cultural, Economic, Technological,
Competitive/Industry and Regulatory forces affecting your selected industry. These are forces
that are external to any specific company.
For each fact that you uncover, you will need to determine whether it is an opportunity or a
threat. Opportunities are facts that can have a positive influence on the industry. Threats are
facts that can have a negative influence on the industry.
Place an ‘O’ beside facts that are Opportunities and a ‘T’ beside facts that are Threats.
Once you have categorized your Opportunities and Threats, you should explain why it is an
Opportunity or Threat. What is the potential impact on the industry?
Place the name of the group member beside each of the points that they have contributed to the
report (see sample). Each group member will submit their 6 references with the assignment.
Provide one electronic copy in SLATE per group.
Each group member will submit their 6 references with the assignment.
All must be submitted on time to avoid a late penalty.
Review the rubric.
All information and data must be paraphrased. You cannot use quotes or quotations.
An example of the format you can use based on the eReader industry is in Slate.
MKTG 19439— INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS RUBRIC

Not Acceptable
(<50%)
Needs Improvement
(50-64%)
Good
(65-79%)
Excellent
(80-100%)
Mark Comments
Demographic Identified 0‐1
relevant factors
Little or no
description.
Identified 1‐2 relevant
factors.
Adequate description.
Identified 3 relevant
factors.
Good description.
Includes 4 or more
relevant facts.
Excellent description.
/10
Socio‐Cultural Identified 0‐1
relevant factors
Little or no
description.
Identified 1‐2 relevant
factors.
Adequate description.
Identified 3 relevant
factors.
Good description.
Includes 4 or more
relevant facts.
Excellent description.
/10
Economic Identified 0‐1
relevant factors
Little or no
description.
Identified 1‐2 relevant
factors.
Adequate description.
Identified 3 relevant
factors.
Good description.
Includes 4 or more
relevant facts.
Excellent description.
/10
Technological Identified 0‐1
relevant factors
Little or no
description.
Identified 1‐2 relevant
factors.
Adequate description.
Identified 3 relevant
factors.
Good description.
Includes 4 or more
relevant facts.
Excellent description.
/10
Regulatory Identified 0‐1
relevant factors
Little or no
description.
Identified 1‐2 relevant
factors.
Adequate description.
Identified 3 relevant
factors.
Good description.
Includes 4 or more
relevant facts.
Excellent description.
/10
Competitive/
Industry
Identified 0‐1
relevant factors
Little or no
description.
Identified 1‐2 relevant
factors.
Adequate description.
Identified 3 relevant
factors.
Good description.
Includes 4 or more
relevant facts.
Excellent description.
/10
Opportunities
and Threats
Many errors were
made when
identifying factors as
opportunities or
threats.
Explanations are
missing or
incomplete.
Several errors were
made when identifying
factors as
opportunities or
threats.
Some critical
information is missing
from the explanations.
Correctly identified
most of the external
factors as an
opportunity or a threat.
Explanation is generally
complete.
Correctly identified all
external factors as
either an opportunity or
a threat.
Consistently provided
exceptional
explanation.
/30
Appropriate use
of reference
sources
Little or no attempt
to paraphrase
content.
Little to no attempt
to use in‐text
citations.
Did not include a
properly formatted
reference list. Only
included hyperlinks
to references (50%
or greater)
The majority of
sources are not
credible or are
outdated.
The total number of
references used
reflects less than 2
references for each
group member.
citations. Many
errors in APA
formatting.
Missing many
references from the
reference list. Many
errors in APA
formatting.
Several sources are
not credible and
some references are
outdated (more than
3 years old).
The total number of
references used
reflects 2‐4
references for each
group member.
formatting or did not
use in‐text citations
consistently. Not all
references have a
matching in‐text
citation. (< 20%).
A few errors in
formatting the
reference list or
references missing (<
20%).
The majority of
sources are credible
and current (within 3
years).
The total number of
references used
reflects 4‐ 6
references for each
group member.
Content is
paraphrased.
Consistent and correct
use of APA format for
in‐text citations. Each
reference in the list
has a matching in‐text
citation.
Consistent and correct
use of APA format for
the reference list.
A variety of highly
credible and current
references are used.
The total number of
references used
reflects at least 6
references for each
group member.
/10
Deductions (if any)
Lateness (as per the late penalty policy)
A minimum of 6 references were not submitted (individual) ‐10%
Appearance (depends on the extent of the issue with appearance)
Spelling & Grammar (depends on the extent of the spelling and grammar errors)
Total /100

Content is not
paraphrased.
Missing many in‐text
Content is
paraphrased.
A few errors in

INDIVIDUAL BRAND ANALYSIS
Each group member will conduct a thorough analysis of one of the brands that competes in the industry
selected. Your brand should be owned by a PUBLIC company as there will be more research information
available to you.
Format
You are expected to include the following information in your report:

Company Background
Provide a brief history
Discuss the size of the company and its growth (provide sales for the past 3 years and growth
rates)
Segments chart – Prepare a table showing two key segments for the company and a description
of each segment using demographic, geographic, psychographic and behavioural variables.
Highlight primary segment. Provide 3-4 reasons for selecting this segment as primary.
Describe the 4 Ps for the brand: Product, Price, Place, Promotion
Competitive Advantage – what is unique about this company in comparison to the
competition? Prepare your response based upon the research you have conducted.
SWOT – Prepare a SWOT analysis. It must be developed from your own research.
Strengths
: positive internal company factors such as: company reputation, high market share,
innovativeness, anything positive in current 4Ps
Weaknesses: negative internal company factors such as: low quality, limited product line, poor
reputation, anything negative in current 4Ps
Opportunities and Threats: are external elements that the company has no control over (you
should select the opportunities and threats from your Group Industry Analysis. Make sure that
any feedback you received from your professor is incorporated.
Reference List

Instructions
This analysis should be submitted in a Microsoft Word document.
All information must be paraphrased and follow the research guidelines described earlier.
Include a title page.
Use in-text citations and include a reference list at the end of the document.
You may NOT use a pre-made SWOT or 4Ps analysis that someone else published on the internet.
These sources include, but are not limited to the Sheridan Library databases, SlideShare, MBA
Skool, PESTLE analysis, scribd, freeswotanalysis.com, Study Moose, and Marketing 91.
Please provide one electronic copy in SLATE per person.
All must be submitted on time to avoid a late penalty.
Use the grading rubric to understand the expectations and requirements.
An example of the format you can use based on a Brand Analysis of Kobo is in Slate.
MKTG19439 BRAND ANALYSIS RUBRIC

Not Acceptable
(<50%)
Needs
Improvement
(50-64%)
Good
(65-79%)
Excellent
(80-100%)
Mark Comments
Company
Background
Background
information not
provided or very little
information.
Performance data is
missing.
Insufficient
background
information provided
on the company.
Data on the
company’s
performance is not
sufficient.
History of the
company is missing
some relevant
information.
Company’s
performance is not
clearly outlined.
Brief history
provided.
An overview of the
company’s current
performance
including size and
growth rate.
/5
Segmentation
Chart
Little understanding/
incorrect
understanding of the
segmentation
variables.
Provides inadequate
description for each
segmentation
variable.
0-1 reasons given for
selection of the
primary segment.
Some understanding
of the segmentation
variables is
demonstrated.
Provides some
description for each
segmentation
variable.
1-2 reasons given for
selection of the
primary segment.
Very good
understanding of the
segmentation
variables is
demonstrated.
Provides good
description of the
segment variables.
2-3 reasons given for
selection of the
primary segment.
Displays excellent
understanding of the
segmentation
variables.
Provides excellent
description of the
segment variables.
3-4 reasons given for
selection of the
primary segment.
/20
Product, Price,
Place and
Promotion
May be missing one
of the 4 Ps.
Descriptions are
missing or are
missing many
important points.
Limited to no
examples provided.
Each of the 4 Ps is
described for the
company.
Limited explanation.
May be missing
examples.
Each of the 4 Ps is
described for the
company with
sufficient explanation
but may be missing
some critical
information.
Some examples are
provided.
Each of the 4 Ps is
described for the
company with
extensive
explanation and
examples.
/20
Competitive
Advantage
Competitive
advantage is not
outlined or doesn’t
make sense.
Rationale is not
included.
Competitive
advantage is not
clearly described
compared to the
competition.
Rationale is missing a
significant amount of
information.
Competitive
advantage is not
clearly described
compared to the
competition.
Rationale is not
complete.
Clearly defined what
is unique about this
company in
comparison to the
competition.
Strong rationale is
provided.
/5
SWOT Identified 0-1 facts in
each quadrant with
little or no
explanation.
Information is not
current.
A great deal of
critical info is
missing.
Insufficient research.
No feedback
incorporated from
the industry
environmental
analysis.
Identified 1-2 facts
for each quadrant
with adequate
explanation.
Information may be
out of date.
Some critical info is
missing.
Little research
conducted.
Much of the
feedback was not
incorporated from
the industry
environmental
analysis.
Identified 2-4 facts
for each quadrant
with good
explanation.
Some information
may be out of date.
A small amount of
critical information
may be missing,
A fair amount of
research conducted.
Some feedback
incorporated from
the industry
environmental
analysis.
Includes more than 4
facts for each
quadrant.
Correctly identified
the most current and
relevant information
and trends.
All facts are clear and
complete.
Extensive research
conducted.
Feedback
incorporated from
the industry
environmental
analysis.
/20

MKTG19439 BRAND ANALYSIS RUBRIC

Not Acceptable
(<50%)
Needs
Improvement
(50-64%)
Good
(65-79%)
Excellent
(80-100%)
Mark Comments
Appropriate use
of reference
sources
Little or no attempt
to paraphrase
content.
Little to no attempt
to use in-text
citations (50% or
greater).
Did not include a
properly formatted
reference list. Only
included hyperlinks
to references (50%
or greater)
The majority of
sources are not
credible or are
outdated.
Less than 5
references used in
the report.
Content is not
paraphrased.
Missing many in
text citations.
Many errors in APA
formatting.
Missing many
references from the
reference list.
Many errors in APA
formatting.
Several sources are
not credible and
some references
are outdated (more
than 5 years old).
5-9 references used
in the report.
Content is
paraphrased.
A few errors in
formatting or did
not use in-text
citations
consistently. Not
all references have
a matching in-text
citation (less than
20%).
A few errors in
formatting the
reference list or
references missing
(less than 20%).
The majority of
sources are credible
and current (within
2 years).
10-14 references
used in the report.
Content is
paraphrased.
Consistent and
correct use of APA
format for in-text
citations. Each
reference in the list
has a matching in
text citation.
Consistent and
correct use of APA
format for the
reference list.
A variety of highly
credible and
current references
are used.
At least 15
references used in
the report.
/10
Deductions (if any)
Lateness (as per the late penalty policy)
Appearance (depends on the extent of the issue with appearance)
Spelling & Grammar (depends on the extent of the spelling and grammar errors)
Total /80

INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION
You will present slides based on your brand/company SWOT. Your presentation should be 4-7 minutes
long not including a question and answer period.
Format
You are expected to include the following information in your presentation:

SWOT – Corrected and updated SWOT from your Individual Brand Analysis. Make sure that any
feedback you received from your professor is incorporated.
Highlight at least 6 potential actions:
1 – build on a strength
2 – correct/minimize a weakness
3 and 4 – exploit an opportunity
5 and 6 – manage a threat
Reference List

Instructions
• Use the SWOT from your Individual Brand Analysis. Make sure you correct and update the SWOT,
incorporating any feedback from your professor.
• Potential Actions are YOUR ideas – these do not require references – that should demonstrate
your knowledge of your brand, your industry, and marketing strategy.
• All information and data must be paraphrased. You may not use quotes or quotations. This is
considered a Breach of Academic Integrity.
• Presentations should be developed in PowerPoint. You should include a wide variety of
graphics/images to make your presentation informative and interesting. Images must be cited
using APA formatting.
• Submit your slides according to the due date posted in Slate. Submit on time to avoid a late
penalty.
• Review the rubric.
• Be on time for your presentation, dress professionally, and be prepared to answer questions
about your brand and potential actions.
• An example of a Presentation for Kobo is in Slate.

MKTG19439 BRAND PRESENTATION RUBRIC

Not Acceptable
(<50%)
Needs
Improvement
(50-64%)
Good
(65-79%)
Excellent
(80-100%)
Mark Comments
CONTENT
SWOT Identified 0-1 facts in
each quadrant with
little or no explanation.
Information is not
current.
A great deal of critical
info is missing.
Insufficient research.
No feedback
incorporated from the
brand analysis.
Identified 1-2 facts
for each quadrant
with adequate
explanation.
Information may be
out of date.
Some critical info is
missing.
Little research
conducted.
Much of the
feedback was not
incorporated from
the brand analysis.
Identified 2-4 facts
for each quadrant
with good
explanation.
Some information
may be out of date.
A small amount of
critical information
may be missing,
A fair amount of
research conducted.
Some feedback
incorporated from
the brand analysis.
Includes more than 4
facts for each
quadrant.
Correctly identified
the most current and
relevant information
and trends.
All facts are clear and
complete.
Extensive research
conducted.
Feedback
incorporated from
the brand analysis.
/20
Potential
Actions
Less than 6 potential
actions provided and
they were not outlined
as requested.
Little or no explanation
provided. Actions are
not logical or feasible.
The actions are not
associated with the
SWOT analysis.
Less than 6 potential
actions provided or
they were not
outlined as
requested.
Little explanation or
actions may lack
clear logic or may not
be feasible.
The actions are not
clearly associated
with the SWOT
analysis.
At least 6 potential
actions were outlined
(as requested).
Some information is
missing. Explanation
is not complete.
The actions are not
all clearly associated
with the SWOT
analysis.
Clearly outlined at
least 6 potential
actions (as
requested) with
exceptional
explanation.
The actions are based
on the SWOT
analysis.
/20
PRESENTATION
Visual Aids Inadequate. Slides are
hard to read,
distracting or
inadequate for
presentation. No
visuals used.
Ineffective. Slides
may be difficult to
read and take away
from the
presentation. Some
visuals used. Too
much information on
many of the slides.
Adequate. Readable
slides that enhance
the presentation.
Visuals not optimally
used. Too much
information on some
of the slides.
Very professional
looking slides. Easy
to read. Good use of
graphics or other
visuals that enhance
the presentation.
Proper amount of
information on the
slides.
/5
Presentation
Skills
Background noise.
Difficult to hear words
due to mumbling, soft
speaking, speaking too
quickly or in a
monotone voice.
Answers to questions
do not demonstrate
brand knowledge.
Speaks too quickly or
is soft-speaking
which interferes with
the ability to
understand the
message.
Answers to questions
do not demonstrate
brand knowledge.
Clear voice.
Speaks fairly clearly
but may have issues
with pace or volume.
Good answers to
questions.
Clear voice.
Good pace.
Speaks moderately
slowly with good
articulation and
volume.
Excellent answers to
questions.
/20

MKTG19439 BRAND PRESENTATION RUBRIC

Not Acceptable
(<50%)
Needs
Improvement
(50-64%)
Good
(65-79%)
Excellent
(80-100%)
Mark Comments
RESEARCH AND REFERENCING
Appropriate use
of reference
sources
Little or no attempt to
paraphrase content.
Little to no attempt to
use in-text citations
(50% or greater).
Did not include a
properly formatted
reference list. Only
included hyperlinks to
references (50% or
greater)
The majority of
sources are not
credible or are
outdated.
Content is not
paraphrased.
Missing many in
text citations.
Many errors in APA
formatting.
Missing many
references from the
reference list.
Many errors in APA
formatting.
Several sources are
not credible and
some references
are outdated (more
than 5 years old).
Content is
paraphrased.
A few errors in
formatting or did
not use in-text
citations
consistently. Not
all references have
a matching in-text
citation (less than
20%).
A few errors in
formatting the
reference list or
references missing
(less than 20%).
The majority of
sources are credible
and current (within
2 years).
Content is
paraphrased.
Consistent and
correct use of APA
format for in-text
citations. Each
reference in the list
has a matching in
text citation.
Consistent and
correct use of APA
format for the
reference list.
A variety of highly
credible and
current references
are used.
/5
Deductions (if any)
Lateness (as per the late penalty policy)
Appearance (depends on the extent of the issue with appearance)
Spelling & Grammar (depends on the extent of the spelling and grammar errors)
Total /70

APPENDIX A – INDUSTRIES
Use the Marketing 1 Research Guide (http://sheridancollege.libguides.com/Marketing1) to learn more
about these industries and brands. The list of brands and companies is not complete – suggest your own!
Should be a public company.

Industries Brands and Companies
Ice Cream Breyers
Chapmans
Nestle
Ben & Jerry’s
Haagen Dazs (General Mills)
Chocolate Bars Mars
Hershey
Cadbury
Nestle
Kit Kat
Smarties
Coffee Crisp
Jewellery Peoples Jewellers (Zales)
Tiffany & Co
Alcohol Smirnoff (Diageo)
Johnnie Walker (Diageo)
Jack Daniels (Brown-Forman)
Snack Foods Kraft
Conagra
General Mills
Nestle
Frozen Foods General Mills
Kraft
Colas Pepsi
Coca-Cola
Dr. Pepper
Cars Honda
Toyota
Ford
GM
Acura (Honda)
Lexus (Toyota)
BMW
Mercedes Benz (Daimler AG)
Salad Dressing Kraft
Renee’s (Kraft)
Hidden Valley (Clorox Company)
Beer Heineken
Molson
Anheuser Busch
Moosehead
Corona
Cosmetics Loreal (Maybelline)
Estee Lauder (MAC)
Coty Inc. (Covergirl)
Laundry Detergent Tide (Procter & Gamble)

 

Downy
Gain
Coffee Shops McDonald’s (McCafe)
Tim Hortons
Starbucks
Second Cup
Home Improvement Canadian Tire
Home Depot
Lowe’s
Rona
Department Stores Hudson Bay
Marshalls (TJX Companies)
Holt Renfrew (Weston Family/Loblaws)
Nordstrom
Apparel (Clothing Stores) Nike
Adidas
Gap
H&M
Hotels Hilton (The Blackstone Group)
Fairmont (Accor Hotels)
Sheraton
Four Seasons
Fast Food McDonald’s
Tim Hortons (Restaurant Brands International)
Burger King (Restaurant Brands International)
Harvey’s (Recipe Unlimited/Cara Foods)
Airlines Air Canada
WestJet
Delta/Northwest Airlines
United Airlines Holdings
Southwest Airlines
Restaurants The Keg
Jack Astor’s
Swiss Chalet