Proposed Solution, Implementation, and Evaluation

Proposed Solution, Implementation, and Evaluation – Rubric Total 100 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.	0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	3.25 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	3.75 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	4.25 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Evaluation Plan: Methods for Evaluation Evaluation Plan: Methods for Evaluation	0 points Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution are not discussed. The proposed methods are not supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	6.5 points Methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution are only partially discussed. The methods are sometimes supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	7.5 points General methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution are summarized. The methods presented are generally supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	8.5 points Adequate methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution are discussed. The methods presented are supported by the findings in the literature analysis.Projected outcomes variables to be assessed are discussed. Overall, the narrative is supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	10 points Realistic and effective methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed solution are detailed. The methods presented are strongly supported by the findings in the literature analysis.
Evaluation Plan: Projected Outcomes and Variables for Assessment Evaluation Plan: Projected Outcomes and Variables for Assessment	0 points Projected outcomes and variables to be assessed are not discussed. The narrative is not supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	6.5 points Projected outcomes are outlined and the variables to be assessed are only partially discussed. The narrative is sometimes supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	7.5 points Projected outcomes are outlned and the variables to be assessed are summarized. The narrative is generally supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	8.5 points Projected outcomes variables to be assessed are discussed. Overall, the narrative is supported by the findings in the literature analysis.	10 points The projected outcomes and the variables to be assessed are thoroughly described. The narrative is strongly supported by the findings in the literature analysis.
Implementation Plan: Strategies for Approval Implementation Plan: Strategies for Approval	0 points Proposed strategies and a baseline comparison for any proposed changes are not discussed.	6.5 points Proposed strategies are incomplete. Current policy, process, or procedure is only partially discussed and a baseline comparison for any proposed changes to these areas cannot be made.	7.5 points General strategies for obtaining the necessary approvals and securing support from organizational leadership and fellow staff are proposed. For any proposed change to current policy, process, or procedure an outline of the current policy, process, or procedure is presented for a baseline comparison. Some areas are vague. Some support is needed.	8.5 points Key strategies for obtaining the necessary approvals and securing support from organizational leadership and fellow staff are proposed. For any proposed change to current policy, process, or procedure a description of the current policy, process, or procedure is presented for a baseline comparison. The narrative has adequate support.	10 points Clear strategies for obtaining the necessary approvals and securing support from organizational leadership and fellow staff are proposed. For any proposed change in current policy, process, or procedure an informative description of the current policy, process, or procedure is presented for a baseline comparison. The narrative is thorough and well-supported.
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.	0 points Sources are not documented.	3.25 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	3.75 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	4.25 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose	0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	4.55 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	5.25 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	5.95 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	7 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Implementation Plan: Resources Required Implementation Plan: Resources Required	0 points Resources required for implementation are not discussed.	6.5 points Resources required for implementation are only partially discussed.	7.5 points Resources required for implementation are outlined. Some aspects related to stakeholders, assessment tools, technology, funds and staff needed to initiate, oversee, and evaluate change are outlined. The narrative demonstrates a general understanding of resources needed for implementation.	8.5 points Resources required for implementation are discussed. Aspects related to stakeholders, assessment tools, technology, funds and staff needed to initiate, oversee, and evaluate change are discussed. The narrative demonstrates understanding of resources needed for implementation.	10 points A well-developed description of the implementation plan is presented. The narrative includes when and how the change will be integrated into the current organizational structure, culture, and workflow, and who will be responsible for initiating the change, educating staff, and overseeing the implementation process. The narrative demonstrates a clear understanding of the implementation process. Resources required for implementation are thoroughly discussed. Aspects related to stakeholders, assessment tools, technology, funds and staff needed to initiate, oversee, and evaluate change are detailed. The narrative demonstrates a clear understanding of resources needed for implementation.
Proposed Solution Proposed Solution	0 points A proposed solution is not presented. The solution is not supported by the findings in the literature review.	9.75 points A partial summary of the proposed solution is outlined. It is unclear whether the solution is supported by the findings in the literature review.	11.25 points A summary of the proposed solution is presented. The solution is generally based on the support indicated in the literature review.	12.75 points An explanation of the proposed solution is presented. Overall, the solution is based on the support indicated in the literature review.	15 points A detailed explanation of the proposed solution is presented and is based on the support indicated in the literature review.
Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.	0 points Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	3.25 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	3.75 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	4.25 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	5 points All format elements are correct.
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction	0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	5.2 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	6 points Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	6.8 points Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	8 points Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Implementation Plan: Description of Plan Implementation Plan: Description of Plan	0 points The description of the implementation plan is omitted.	9.75 points The description of the implementation plan is incomplete.	11.25 points A summary of the implementation plan is presented. The narrative includes some aspects of when and how the change will be integrated into the current organizational structure, culture, and workflow, and who will be responsible for initiating the change, educating staff, and overseeing the	12.75 points A description of the implementation plan is presented. Overall, narrative includes when and how the change will be integrated into the current organizational structure, culture, and workflow, and who will be responsible for initiating the change, educating staff, and overseeing the implementation process. The	15 points A well-developed description of the implementation plan is presented. The narrative includes when and how the change will be integrated into the current organizational structure, culture, and workflow, and who will be responsible for initiating the change, educating staff, and overseeing the implementation process. The

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
implementation process. The narrative demonstrates a general understanding of the implementation process.	narrative demonstrates an adequate understanding of the implementation process.	narrative demonstrates a clear understanding of the implementation process.