criterion mark) criterion mark criterion mark criterion mark criterion mar Introduction of Poor description of Introduction is Introduction is Introduction of the Introduction is very background information of company, company company background, needs for an information system to presented briefly with some relevance and generally presented in good fashion, however missing one company case study is well written with clear discussion about the well communicated, very clear background, discussion about the needs for an support IS/competitive missing elements such element such as company, an IS needase study, needs for Information systems advantage strategies as needs for an importance of analysis, linked to n information system information systems information systems company IS systems, In company, gain
Page I 1
Asia Pacific International College Pry Ltd. Trading as Asia Pac SS Regent Street, Chippendale, Sydney 2008, 02-8318 8111 PPV1200), CPICOS 030480
International College
4110APIC
to support business strategies (10 marks) to support IS/competitive advantage strategies in business, IS/competitive advantage strategies IS strategy, and cornpetitive advantage strategies. competitive advantage, linked to company IS/competitive advantage/business strategies Appraise three alternative informatior systems solutions and explanation on the viability of each of the alternative solutions. Discussion on Cost-based for the three alternatives. (30 mark) Poor ideas, irrelevant/no discussion on three alternative IS solutions, and cost- based for each of the three alternatives Brief discussion about the three alternative IS solutions and cost based for three alternatives Generally good discussion about the relevant parts, three alternative viability solutions, and cost — based analysis Very clear ideas, solutions and recommendations to convince the company to acquire best ISsystems to solve problems. A very detailed and very clear presenting ideas, findings and endations to acquirrecomme IS solutions. Demonstrated an understanding of the mportance of in- hour development and outsourcing components. (20 marks) Lack understanding of the distinction between in- house development and outsourcing components Brief discussion about in-house development and outsourcing components. Generally good discussion on the distinction between in-house development and outsourcing components Very clear ideas and discussion on the distinction between in-house development and outsourcing components A very detailed and very clear presenting ideas of the distinction between in-house development and outsourcing components. Detail an acquisition, rollout and management plan strategy for three alternatives. Select one best information system alternatives. (30 marks) Lack understanding of an acquisition, rollout and management plan strategy for three alternatives. Brief discussion on an acquisition, rollout and management plan strategy for three alternatives. Brief discussion on one of IS system alternatives. Generally good discussion of an acquisition, rollout and management plan strategy for three alternatives. Good coverage on one of IS system alternatives. Very clear understanding of a good acquisition, rollout and management plan strategy for three alternatives. Very good discussion on one of IS system alternatives. A very good and very clear understanding of the best option for acquisition, rollout and management plan strategy for one of IS system alternatives. Referencing (10 marks) Lack consistency with many errors. Unclear referencing/style Generally good referencing/style Very clear referencing/style Clear styles with excellent source of references. Appropriate referencing using Harvard referencing style