6:17 pm Tue 26 Mar 4G ®- 97% • rZ blackboard.ecu.edu.au

3 of 3
Criteria Fail (49% Or Below) 0-4.5 marks Pass (50-59%) 5 — 5.5 marks Credit (60-69%) 6-6.5 marks Distinction (70-79%) 7-7.5 marks High Distinction (80-100%) 8-10 marks Academic/professional standard of written communication. This section is worth up to 10% of the mark. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax are very poor and/or there is no clear logical flow. Uses language that is unsuitable for the audience and purpose or is unclear in its message. Sentences are repetitive and simplistic, incomplete or run-on. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, syntax and referencing demonstrate some errors (more than 5). Has a basic structure but is not clear throughout. Uses language that is adequate but imprecise for the audience, purpose or context. Sentences show some variety and accuracy. Adequate grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, syntax and referencing with only a few errors (3-5). Has a clear structure indicated by headings but some content is not as well analysed. Uses appropriate language with good awareness of audience purpose and context. Appropriate and accurate grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, syntax and referencing. Minor errors (1- 2 errors). Clear structure and varied sentence structure throughout. Uses suitable language with full awareness of audience, purpose and context. Excellent grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax. Accurate and consistent reference citation throughout the report. No errors detected. Structure helps clarify logic of argument. Clear conclusion of additional learning drawn from reading and application. Uses industry appropriate language that is precise and engaging with outstanding contribution for the audience, purpose and context. Criteria Fail (49% Or Below) 0-6 marks Pass (50-59%) 6.5 – 7.5 marks Credit (60-69%) 8-10 marks Distinction (70-79%) 10.5-11.5 marks High Distinction (80-100%) 12-15 marks Critical analysis and integration of the literature. This criterion is worth up to 15% of the mark Fails to demonstrate a clear argument or critical understanding of the topic or integrate the literature. Shows little or no understanding of how the topic has impact on industry practice. The conclusion shows little or no indication of synthesising information or drawing conclusions based on literature and professional practice. Demonstrates an emerging argument and some understanding of the topic. Begins to make connections within the literature to show understanding and learning from new information obtained. The ideas discussed show some focus and organisation. Little attempt at analysis of the influence of the topic in the workplace provided. There is a basic conclusion that begins to show integration of learning and a basis for practice. Demonstrates a logical argument and beginnings of a significant understanding of the topic. Ideas from recent studies are explored and developed with adequate support. Shows some ability to compare, contrast, integrate ideas and evaluate research findings. The conclusion is above average and shows both integration of material and understanding of changes required to professional practice. Demonstrates good critical analysis and argument throughout and shows the way the topic influences behaviour or processes in the workplace, especially as it impacts practice. The information is well articulated and shows an extended understanding of the topic and adjustments to be made in professional practice. The conclusion is integrated with material presented in the review and provides some insight into future actions. Demonstrates deep critical analysis and argument throughout using sophisticated language. New and extended learning demonstrates an interconnectedness of concepts and practice. The analysis draws out and exemplifies the key understandings of topic and its management in practice. Logically presented essay that shows different perspectives. Succinct and precise conclusions drawn based on the literature. Suggestions for future action are offered.