HLTH101 Assessment 3 – Marking Rubric v2022-23
You will be assessed on your ability to clearly, concisely and accurately:
| Marking Criteria | Fail (0-9) | Pass (10-12) | Credit (13-14) | Distinction (15-16) | High Distinction (17-20) | Mark |
| Discuss key ideas from relevant modules in your two forum posts (20 marks). |
Inadequate or missing post or posts; inadequate discussion in one or both posts. |
Basic discussion in both posts; mostly descriptive with little or no analysis. |
Sound discussion in both posts; mostly descriptive with some analysis and/or use of examples. |
Detailed, succinct discussion in both posts; strong analysis and/or use of examples. |
Comprehensive, succinct discussion in both posts; strong analysis well linked to examples. |
/20 |
| Marking Criteria | Fail (0-14) | Pass (15-19) | Credit (20-22) | Distinction (23-25) | High Distinction (26-30) | Mark |
| Expand on your forum posts to apply learning from this unit to your chosen health or social care practice (30 marks). |
Inadequate expansion on one or both posts; learning poorly or not applied to professional development. |
Basic expansion on both posts; basic application of learning to professional development. |
Sound expansion on both posts; sound application of learning to professional development, with some analysis and examples |
Detailed expansion on both posts; sound application of learning to professional development, good analysis that is well linked to examples |
Comprehensive expansion on both posts; sound application of learning to professional development with critical analysis that is very well linked to examples |
/30 |
| Marking Criteria | Fail (0-9) | Pass (10-12) | Credit (13-14) | Distinction (15-16) | High Distinction (17-20) | Mark |
| Locate, analyse and apply relevant literature to support your writing (30 marks). |
Little or no evidence of effective research; sources inadequate and/or inappropriate; poor description, and/or poor or no analysis. |
Basic evidence of research; most sources adequate and appropriate; narrative which is mostly descriptive with little or no analysis |
Sound evidence of research; adequate and appropriate sources; some analysis and use of examples. |
Evidence of thorough research; good breadth and depth of sources; analysis with good use of examples. |
Evidence of comprehensive research; high-level breadth and depth of sources; detailed and insightful analysis well linked to examples. |
/30 |
| Marking Criteria | Fail (0-9) | Pass (10-12) | Credit (13-14) | Distinction (15-16) | High Distinction (17-20) | Mark |
| Present the findings in essay format. Use academic tone and language, and APA 7th edition referencing style including in text citations and References list (20 marks). |
Poor adherence to required presentation; academic tone and language absent or inconsistent; little or no referencing and/or poor adherence to APA 7th edition formatting for in-text citations and/or References list; little or no evidence of researching. |
Basic presentation; academic tone and language mostly used; some adherence to APA 7th edition formatting for in-text citations and/or References list; evidence of basic researching. |
Good presentation; academic tone and language used; adherence to APA 7th edition formatting for in-text citations and References list with few inconsistencies; some evidence of wider researching. |
Very good presentation; consistent academic tone and language; adherence to APA 7th edition formatting for in-text citations and References list with very few, minor inconsistencies; evidence of wider researching throughout.. |
Professional standard of presentation; academic tone and language used to high level; strict adherence to APA 7th edition formatting for in text citations and References list; strong evidence of wider researching throughout. |
/20 |
Marked by Date TOTAL /100