Context: This assessment asks you to draw upon your collective learning of historical and current
understanding of the breadth and depth of learning differences and wellbeing. The assessment is
about a person-centred approach of learning differences in the context of daily life, schooling, and
with specific reference to adopting measures for positive wellbeing beyond education.
LDF402 Assessment 3 Brief Page 1 of 6
ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF | |
Subject Code and Title | LDF402 Learning Differences |
Assessment | Folio: Is different too different? |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | 2500 words |
Learning Outcomes | a) Understand and apply a ‘person centred ’ approach to analyse and problem solve issues and challenges associated with learning differences. b) Critique and reflect upon own and others’ biases, prejudices and assumptions associated with learning differences. c) Demonstrate and apply an understanding of inclusive educational practices for supporting individuals with learning differences. d) Critique historical and contemporary perspectives and practices for supporting individuals with learning differences and their carers. e) Demonstrate independent research skills drawing on a diverse range of relevant sources and demonstrate communication skills for professional and academic audiences. |
Submission | Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT on Sunday at the end of Module 6 (Week 12) |
Weighting | 50% |
Total Marks | 100 marks |
Instructions:
This assessment requires you to compile a thematic analysis of three cartoon images (attached below),
with reference to the subject resources, assessment tasks, discussions and your own research. This will
be presented as a folio of your learning. The cartoon images serve as a prompt for your in-depth
analysis and representation of your understanding of the breadth and depth of learning differences, the
historical, and current impact differences impede on an individual’s wellbeing as well as a
recognition of more contemporary approaches to understanding differences.
To best represent your understanding of this subject your folio should cover these three themes, each of
which are linked to the cartoon images, and the modules studied.
1. Learning disabilities as learning differences
2. Looking beyond the acronym
3. Promotion of positivity in differences
It is recommended that your folio is set out in the following layout:
• Introduction to each cartoon image – setting, characters, imagery, reference to the subject (250
words)
• Expand each of the three themes, drawing together module materials/discussion and linking to a
portrayal of learning differences in each image (600 words, each theme)
• Conclusion – demonstrate an appreciation for the importance of understanding learning
differences (450 words).
LDF 403 Assessment 3 Explanation
The cartoon images serve as a prompt for your in-depth analysis and representation
of your understanding of the breadth and depth of learning differences, the historical, and
current impact differences impede on an individual’s wellbeing as well as a recognition
of more contemporary approaches to understanding differences.
Introduction
Describe the images – discuss what you see in each (character and setting, explain imagery) What is
the meaning of each image? (What do you think it is showing?) What does the text (writing on
them say) All discussion should be in reference to learning differences.
Analysing Each Image
1. Learning disabilities as learning differences (explain the meaning of this). What does this mean to
you? Based on the knowledge you have gained in this subject so far. Explain why learning disabilities
should be seen as learning differences (focus on the resources in module 6 in your discussion), use any
of the 3 images to explain this theme.
2. Looking beyond the acronym why is this important to look beyond. What does this theme mean, why
is it important to look beyond the acronym or the disability? Focus on the resources in module 6 and
include your own research and Ross Greene’s view to explain the importance of this, use any of the 3
images to explain this theme.
3. Promotion of positivity in differences include strengths. Explain the importance of focusing on the
strengths and not just the challenges that students with learning disabilities and difficulties, include
discussion of neurodiversity, use resources in module 6.
LDF402 Assessment 3 Brief Page 2 of 6
Conclusion
Demonstrate an appreciation for the importance of understanding learning differences (450 words)
say why it is important to understand learning differences- discuss the benefits to teachers, students
and parents, include references in your discussions
Remember to use APA writing style and to include references in your discussions
Cartoon images: Green, R. (2017) Lives in the Balance.
https://livesinthebalance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Restraint_0.pdf
https://livesinthebalance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Different-Lenses.pdf
https://livesinthebalance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Alphabet.pdf
Academic Integrity:
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately
referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide.
Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic
Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are
viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment
drafts.
Special Consideration:
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected
or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education
Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application
for Special Consideration form to your Learning Facilitator.
Submission Instructions:
Submit the case study response via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in ASL
402 Autism: Contemporary Practices. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade
Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades
LDF402 Assessment 3 Brief Page 3 of 6
LDF402 Assessment 3 Brief Page 4 of 6
Learning Rubric: Assessment 3
Assessment Attributes |
Fail (Unacceptable) | Pass (Functional) |
Credit (Proficient) | Distinction (Advanced) | High Distinction (Exceptional) |
Grade Description (Grading Scheme) |
Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points. |
Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of indepth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
LDF402 Assessment 3 Brief Page 5 of 6
Knowledge and understanding 30% |
Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. |
The response identifies the three topics in the context of key issues in learning differences and wellbeing and identifies experiences and support needs of the person with learning differences and associated challenges. |
The response demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the development of practices for educational support required for learning differences. |
The response demonstrates a high order analysis historical and contemporary practices in relation to the key issues associated within each topic. |
Comprehensive reflection and coverage of learning differences and wellbeing integrating the importance of lived experience understanding and support in the context of education and work life. |
Critical reflection 30% |
Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. |
The response demonstrates a capacity to critique and analyse reasons for current views about learning differences and wellbeing in education. |
The response identifies contemporary pedagogy implementation challenges in relation to the person first approach. |
Using the person first approach, a thorough demonstration of the support approaches for an individual with learning differences in education and workplaces. |
Specific perspective is presented imaginatively and accurately taking in to account the complexity of learning differences and wellbeing. |
LDF402 Assessment 3 Brief Page 6 of 6
Capacity to apply a person-centred approach 30% |
Limited synthesis and analysis. Limited application/recommendat ions based upon analysis. |
The relationship between the shift of the student understandings about learning differences and wellbeing is demonstrated through the lens of the person-centred approach |
There is clear identification and understanding of the contemporary support required for individuals with learning differences challenges. |
The response demonstrates a highly developed capacity to integrate a person-centred approach within each topic. |
The folio demonstrates a creative, innovative synthesis of ideas. |
Academic conventions 10% |
Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. |
The response is written according to academic genre. The response demonstrates a consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support ideas, however these are not always well developed. |
Is well-written and adheres to t academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or sum Demonstrates consistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. |
Is very well-written and adhere the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading |
Is very well-written using the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading. There are no mistakes with APA. |