Assessment 1 - Australia Assignments

HRMT20024 – Assessment 1– Presentation Rubric
Note: This is an illustration of the marking criteria that will be used in the Turnitin system. To see your marks on the criteria, open your assessment through Turnitin and click on the marking criteria button.The markers
will provide feedback throughout your assessment in the ‘Grademark’ view in Turnitin. You can access this by clicking on the small blue pencil icon next to your assessment submission.
While there is no set rule for what your similarity index should be, you should aim for a similarity score that is less than 20%. A high similarity score can be due to a very long reference list though. The main thing
to look out for is WHERE the similarity is being shown. If there is a high level of similarity found in the body of the assessment, you will probably lose marks for not presenting your own ideas. A high level of
similarity in the body of your assessment may significantly affect your marks for each of the criteria, as marks are given based on original text and appropriately referenced text only. It is suggested that you
reduce the use of direct quotes from other sources wherever possible. Markers will analyse the similarity score reported by Turnitin on a case‐by‐case basis.

Key Criteria	0 (Not Shown)	2 (Poor)	3 (Unsatisfactory)	4 (Satisfactory)	5 (Good)	6 (Very Good)	7 (Excellent)
Correct Referencing (5%)	Strictly comply with APA 7 referencing style.
Research aim and question (10%)	Satisfactory understanding	Above average understanding	Strong understanding	Comprehensive and insightful presentation
Method (10%)	No explanation of method	Very limited understanding of method	Limited understanding of method	Satisfactory understanding	Above average understanding	Strong understanding of method	Comprehensive understanding and description of method
Findings (10%)	No knowledge nor understanding of the HRM topic.	Inaccurate knowledge of the HRM topic. Irrelevant information presented. Poor understanding of information and concepts presented.	Insufficient knowledge of the HRM topic. Information appears to be randomly chosen and not related to material covered in the unit. Limited understanding of information and concepts presented.	Demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of the HRM topic. Information from existing thinking in HRM presented and explained. Satisfactory understanding of information and concepts presented.	Demonstrates above average knowledge of the HRM topic. Relevant information presented from latest thinking research in HRM. Above average understanding of information and concepts presented.	Demonstrates good knowledge of the HRM topic with insight and depth. Accurate, interesting, and relevant information presented from latest thinking research in HRM. Well‐developed understanding of Information and concepts presented.	Demonstrates a comprehensive and highly insightful knowledge of the HRM topic. Highly relevant and informative material and evidence presented from latest thinking research in HRM. Highly developed understanding of information and concepts presented.
Article Conclusion (10%)	No conclusions provided.	Brief conclusion	Brief conclusion with limited links to the presentation	Demonstrates satisfactory understanding of article conclusions	Demonstrates above average understanding and explanation of article conclusions	Clear and concise explanation of article conclusion	Clear and concise explanation of article conclusions and implications
Contribution to topic (10%)	No attempt to link to week’s theme	Very limited understanding	Limited understanding of how the article contributes tothe week’s theme	Some understanding of howthe article relates to the week’s theme	Good understanding of how the article relates to the week’s theme	Strong understanding of how the article relates to the week’s theme	Sophisticated understanding of how the article relates to the week’s theme
Quality of presentation (25%)	No ability to present.	Ideas on the HRM topic is disorganized and not coherent. Pace is highly inappropriate. The student’s voice is: not clear; not expressive and/or the student pronounces a number of terms incorrectly.	Ideas on the HRM topic is unclear and not in a logical way. Pace is inappropriate. The student’s voice is: not clear at times; not expressive and/or the student pronounces occasionally some terms incorrectly.	Ideas on the HRM topic are satisfactorily organised with clarity in parts, pacing adequate, though may be over‐or under length. The student’s voice is clear and expressive at times during the presentation.	Ideas on the HRM topic are presented in an organised way, though lack clarity in parts, adequately paced. The student’s voice is clear and expressive for most of the presentation.	Ideas on the HRM topic are presented effectively and expressed in an organised way, appropriately paced. The student has a clear voice, and expressive during the presentation.	Ideas on the HRM topic are clearly and professionally articulated, presented effectively in an organised way, and are appropriately paced. The student has a clear voice, exceptionally expressive during the whole presentation.
Visual Aids (20%)	No visual aids are used.	The visual aids are poorly designed or unrelated to the message presented.	Limited visual aids are used and inappropriately designed.	The visual aids are satisfactorily designed and at times support the presentation.	The visual aids are well designed and adequately support the presentation.	The visual aids are well designed, confidently used and effectively support the presentation.	The visual aids are well designed and confidently used. Add impact to the presentation.