ASSESSMENT ONE: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C BUSN20017 ǀ Assessment 1 Term 1, 2023, Marking Rubric ǀ Page | 1 ǀ
School of Business and Law
CQUniversity Australia ǀ
| Key Criteria | High Distinction Excellent (HD) | Distinction Good (D) | Credit Fail (C) | Pass Average (P) | Fail Poor (F) |
| Journal Article One An overview of the main focus or purpose or aim of the article (e.g., This article focuses on . . . .); A summary of the theory, definitions of the main variables or concepts, and, if applicable, the research methods (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods);’ A description of the findings, results and/or conclusions; and An explanation of how this article will fit into your presentation (This article will fit into the presentation . . . .). |
Excellent review of the journal article; provides an overview of the main focus/purpose/aims, summarises theory/definitions/variables/methods, describes the findings and/or conclusions and explains how the article fits into the presentation-all in a superior manner 3.36 – 4.0 marks. |
Good review; of the journal article; provides an overview of the main focus/purpose/aims, summarises theory/definitions/variables/methods, describes the findings and/or conclusions and explains how the article fits into the presentation. One of the parts could have been more specifically articulated, described and/or explained. 2.96- 3.32 marks. |
Fair review; of the journal article; provides an overview of the main focus/purpose/aims, summarises theory/definitions/variables/methods, describes the findings and/or conclusions and explains how the article fits into the presentation Two of the parts could have been more specifically articulated, described and/or explained. 2.56 – 2.92 marks. |
Average review; of the journal article; provides an overview of the main focus/purpose/aims, summarises theory/definitions/variables/methods, describes the findings and/or conclusions and explains how the article fits into the presentation All parts could have been more specifically articulated, described and/or explained. marks. 2.0 – 2.52 marks. |
Extremely poor review. One or more of the required parts is missing and/or the article is not from a journal listed on the required journal list. Zero -1.96 marks. |
| Journal Article Two See above |
See above | See above | See above | See above. | See above |
| Journal Article Three See above |
See above | See above | See above | See above | See above |
| Journal Article Four See above |
See above | See above | See above | See above | See above |
ASSESSMENT ONE: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C BUSN20017 ǀ Assessment 1 Term 1, 2023, Marking Rubric ǀ Page | 2 ǀ
School of Business and Law
CQUniversity Australia ǀ
| Journal Article Five See above |
See above | See above | See above | See above | See above |
| References APA 7th Edition (see the APA document in Assessment Section of Moodle) |
Excellent reflection of the APA format. All references conform to the APA format. There are no errors. The overall Turnitin score is 20% or below. 2.52 – 3.0 marks. |
Good reflection of the APA format. Most of the references conform to the APA format. The overall Turnitin score is 20% or below. 2.22 – 2.49 marks. |
Fair reflection of the APA format. There are systematic errors within the references. The overall Turnitin score is 20% or below. 1.92 – 2.19 marks. |
Average reflection of the APA format. There are systematic errors within the references. The overall Turnitin score is greater than 20% 1.5 – 1.89 marks. |
No reference list provided 0-1.47 marks. |