ASSESSMENT GUIDE
MITS5003
Wireless Networks and
Communication
Semester 1, 2023
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Assessment overview
| Assessments | Overview | Weight | Due date | Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO) |
| Assessment 1: Case Study and Presentation |
In this case study you will explore some of the latest techniques in wireless communications and networks and apply these to a given case study for methodology selection, requirements and problem solving. |
10% | Session 5 Sunday 11:55 PM |
ULO1 and ULO2 |
| Assessment 2: Research Report | In this assessment you will write a critique report on an academic paper in the field of wireless for applications to real world scenarios of communications and networks |
10% | Session 9 Sunday 11:55 PM |
ULO1 and ULO4 |
| Assessment 3: Major Assignment | In this assessment you will work individually to apply your knowledge, to analyse and develop certain design models based on specific requirements in a simulation environment. |
30% | Session 12 Sunday 11:55 PM |
ULO1-ULO4 |
2
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au
Referencing guides
You must reference all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use the
IEEE referencing style when referencing in your assessments in this unit. Refer to the library’s
referencing guides for more information.
• https://elearning.vit.edu.au/pluginfile.php/473840/block_html/content/VIT%20Library%20Refer
encing%20-%20IEEE%20-%2007042020.pdf
Academic misconduct
VIT enforces that the integrity of its students’ academic studies follows an acceptable level of
excellence. VIT will adhere to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance
of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviours that are
“academic misconduct”, including plagiarism.
Late submissions
In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies,
Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of a
penalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.
Short extensions and special consideration
Special Consideration is a request for:
• Extensions of the due date for an assessment, other than an examination (e.g. assignment
extension).
• Special Consideration (Special Consideration in relation to a Completed assessment, including
an end-of-unit Examination).
Students wishing to request Special Consideration in relation to an assessment the due date of which
has not yet passed must engage in written emails to the teaching team to Request for Special
Consideration as early as possible and prior to start time of the assessment due date, along with any
accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.
Inclusive and equitable assessment
Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a
documented disability or impairment. Contact the unit teaching team for more information.
Contract Cheating
Contract cheating usually involves the purchase of an assignment or piece of research from another
party. This may be facilitated by a fellow student, friend or purchased on a website. Other forms of
contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student’s place.
Contract cheating warning:
• By paying someone else to complete your academic work, you don’t learn as much as you
could have if you did the work yourself.
• You are not prepared for the demands of your future employment.
• You could be found guilty of academic misconduct.
• Many of for pay contract cheating companies recycle assignments despite guarantees of
“original, plagiarism-free work” so similarity is easily detected by TurnitIn.
• Penalties for academic misconduct include suspension and exclusion.
• Students in some disciplines are required to disclose any findings of guilt for academic
misconduct before being accepted into certain professions (e.g., law).
• You might disclose your personal and financial information in an unsafe way, leaving yourself
open to many risks including possible identity theft.
• You also leave yourself open to blackmail – if you pay someone else to do an assignment for
you, they know you have engaged in fraudulent behaviour and can always blackmail you.
Grades
We determine your grades to the following Grading Scheme:
| Grade | Percentage |
| A | 80% – 100% |
| B | 70% – 79% |
| C | 60% – 69% |
| D | 50% – 59% |
| F | 0% – 49% |
5
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Assessment details
Assessment 1: Case Study and Presentation
Overview
| Weight | Length | Due date | ULO |
| 10% | 1000-1500 | Session 5 Sunday 11:55 PM | ULO1 and ULO2 |
Introduction
In this assessment you are required to explore the given case study and provide a solution, employing the latest wireless communication techniques. The
solution needs to be presented in a report and a short video presentation discussing findings and the proposed solution. The assessment will help in developing
an understanding of communication in wireless networks and the limitations and challenges.
Case Study: Home office
Jan gained permission from her job to work from home throughout and immediately after her pregnancy, as per her doctor’s advice for greater bed rest. She
does, however, need to retrieve huge files from the corporate local area network (LAN), alter them, and return them to another point on the LAN on a regular
basis in order to execute her job efficiently. She also requires easy access to a phone and occasionally desires to print something for convenience or record
keeping. Jan’s company’s Information Technology (IT) department has given her instructions on how to connect to the corporate LAN.
Jan currently enjoys high-speed Internet access at her house. The only way to get online is through a computer in a family room in the home’s finished
basement. This PC is used by Jan’s family for Internet access, online gaming, and school activities. A colour printer is linked to the computer. Jan wants to turn
an underused upstairs bedroom into a home office. She wants to be able to work from a more comfortable setting, such as her couch or bed, as her pregnancy
progresses. She already owns a cordless phone and plans to get a laptop computer and possibly a second printer. However, a short call to her broadband
provider has made her reconsider the cost viability of installing additional cabling for broadband access in other parts of her house. Jan talks to some of her
co-workers about her difficulty, and one of them mentions Wi-Fi. Jan conducts some research into the wireless LAN goods available and determines that
several of them are within her budget.
6
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Because Jan already has broadband connectivity installed in her house, the scope of Jan’s solution will be constrained. She also has information on how to
connect to the company’s LAN. She has not, however, tested to determine if these instructions will be affected by the wireless home network. Jan’s issue is
that she needs consistent, high-speed connectivity to the corporate LAN from her new home office and other handy locations throughout the house. She
wants to interfere with the family PC as little as possible, and she requires her laptop to be unavailable from the family PC. She would like to be able to print
from her home office. Her approach, however, must work within a constrained budget. However, her solution must fit within a limited budget. Finally, she
must have rapid access to all the equipment she requires for her solution.
Figure 1. Jan’s Site
7
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
The proposed solution must consider the following criteria:
• Any area where she wishes to use the laptop should be less than 100 metres (almost 300 feet) away from the access point.
• Interference generated by the cordless phone and microwave.
• The home network should be cost-effective and,
• The network should be secure.
Other users on the home network
Submission Instructions
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these dropboxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 5 Sunday 11:55PM.
The Turnitin similarity score will be used in determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles,
online resources and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate
drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you will have a chance to change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior
to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make re-submissions.
Please Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at the rate of 10% of the assessment final grade per day including
weekends.
Marking Guide: 50 Marks
| Task | Description | Marks |
| Report Layout | The report style, language and structure should be appropriate. | 5 |
| Introduction | This section should include a few sentences which provide an outline of the assessment. | 5 |
| Elaborate | Elaborate the importance of the home office and discuss how the proposed solution meets requirements of the home office. |
5 |
| Design | Update the site design to include all the new hardware required for the secured home network. The site design can be modified, or you could create a new design based on the existing site, any tool could be used to provide the design. |
10 |
| Critical Analysis | The students are required to critically analyse, the communication channels and transmission techniques used by the wireless devices, and the limitations of the proposed wireless devices. |
10 |
8
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| Presentation | The students are required to submit a 5-minute video presentation, discussing their proposed solution. The video presentation should not have more than 10 slides. |
5 |
| Conclusion | Summary of the report | 5 |
| References | Follow the IEEE style | 5 |
Marking criteria/Rubric
You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:
| Assessment criteria | Exceptional >=80% | Admirable 70% – 79% | Creditable 60% – 69% | Acceptable 50% – 59% | Unsatisfactory <=49 |
| C1. Report Layout 5 points |
Extremely well structured and organized report; use of professional language |
Well-structured and organized report; use of professional language; |
Structured and organised report; use of language is appropriate |
Structured and organised report; use of language could be improved |
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow; language needs to be proofread plenty of errors |
| C2. Introduction 5 points |
The introduction is well rounded and provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets an excellent flow for the report |
The introduction provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets a good flow for the report |
The introduction provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets the flow for the report |
The introduction could relate more to the assessment |
The introduction does not relate to the assessment and does not set the flow for the assessment |
9
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| C3. Elaborate 5 points |
The section demonstrates the importance of the home office extremely well; the section provides an excellent explanation of how the proposal meets the requirements |
The importance of the home offices is demonstrated well; the section provides a good explanation of how the proposal meets the requirements |
The section demonstrated the importance of the home office; the section provides an explanation of how the proposal meets the requirement |
The section briefly describes the importance of a home office and provides some explanation of how the proposal meets the requirement |
The importance of the home office is hardly explained; little discussion of how the proposal meets the requirements |
| C4. Design 10 points |
An updated site design has been presented using an industry tool; the design does a great job in addressing the requirements; the home office design provides a good security solution |
An updated site design has been presented using an industry tool; the design does a good job in addressing the requirements; the home office design provides a security design |
An updated site design has been presented using an industry tool; the design addresses the requirements; the home office design provides a security design |
An updated site design has been presented; the design addresses some of requirements |
A brief site design has been presented; the design does not meet the requirements and does not address the security |
| C5. Critical Analysis 10 points |
Provided an excellent critical analysis with focus on the communication channels and transmission techniques used by wireless devices; a well-rounded assessment of the limitation of the |
Provided a good critical analysis with focus on the communication channels and transmission techniques used by wireless devices; an assessment of the limitation of the proposed wireless devices |
The critical analysis focused on the communication channels and transmission techniques used by wireless devices; the limitations of proposed wireless devices was somewhat discussed |
The critical analysis focused on the communication channels and transmission techniques used by wireless devices |
The critical analysis lacks depth and detail; the critical analysis did not cover the limitations of the proposed wireless devices |
10
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| proposed wireless devices |
|||||
| C4. Presentation 5 points |
Presentation is structured with clear beginning, middle and end; Main points were easy to follow and logical; speaker engaged audience, material presented was suited to length of presentation with clear summarization of main points. |
Most information presented in logical sequence; generally, very well organized but better transitions might have been given; Material was well suited to length of presentation with summary of main points provided. |
Most information presented in logical sequence; generally, organized but better transitions might have been given; Material was suited to length of presentation with summary of main points provided. |
Structure of presentation was hard to follow with main ideas loosely connected; insufficient material presented to support main ideas. Conclusion unclear. |
Presentation is choppy and disjointed; does not flow; Presentation ended without a conclusion or summary of key points. |
| C7. Conclusion 5 points |
Provided an excellent summary of the assessment, covering all aspects of the assessment |
Provided a good summary of the assessment, covering most aspects of the assessment |
Provided a summary of the assessment; somewhat covered the aspects of the assessment |
Provided a summary of the assessment. |
The conclusions failed to summarise the assessment |
| C8. References 5 points |
The references followed IEEE Style; the references were cited and complete |
The references followed IEEE Style; most the references were cited and complete |
Most references followed IEEE Style; some of the references were cited and complete |
Most references followed IEEE Style; the references were not cited |
The references did not follow IEEE Style and were not cited and incomplete |
11
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Assessment 2: Research Report
Overview
| Weight | Length | Due date | ULO |
| 10% | 1000-1500 | Session 9 Sunday 11:55 PM | ULO1 and ULO4 |
Introduction
In this assessment students are required to research on an article in wireless communication. The research needs to be geared towards the transmission
fundamentals with focus on the wireless channels, analysing the performance of wireless networks. The assessment is aimed to improve the student’s
investigation and analysis skills.
Task
In this assessment you are required to prepare a 2-page abstract in IEEE Style, use the template provided on the LMS. To prepare the abstract you need to
select an article published in 2015 and later. The selected article needs to include wireless transmission fundamentals. The article needs to be on one of the
areas given below.
• Cellular IoT
• Ad hoc wireless networks
• Cooperative Communications
• AI Powered Wireless Communications
• Channel Coding
• Smart Wireless Sensors
• Heterogeneous cellular networks
• Next generation WiFi
• Cognitive Radio and Software-Defined Radio
• UWB Communications
12
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
The report must follow the template provided on the LMS. Please note that citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style.
Submission Instructions
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these dropboxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 9 Sunday 11:55PM.
The Turnitin similarity score will be used in determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal
articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the
appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you will have a chance to change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only
allowed prior to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make re-submissions.
Please Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at the rate of 10% of the assessment final grade per day including
weekends.
Marking Guide: 50 Marks
| Task | Description | Marks |
| Report Layout | The report layout, language and structure should be appropriate. The report should follow the template provided on the LMS and should be 2 pages. |
5 |
| Abstract | Include the step-by-step explanation of configuration and the related protocols and technologies | 5 |
| Introduction | This section should provide an outline of the assessment and the following sections. | 5 |
| Literature Review | You should perform a literature survey on the selected article. The literature survey should include at least 5 research papers, published no later than 2015. |
15 |
| Evaluate | Based on the available literature, identify and evaluate the performance of wireless communication networks. | 10 |
| Conclusion | Summary of the report. | 5 |
| References | Follow the IEEE Style | 5 |
13
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Marking criteria/Rubric
You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:
| Assessment criteria | Exceptional >=80% | Admirable 70% – 79% | Creditable 60% – 69% | Acceptable 50% – 59% | Unsatisfactory <=49% |
| C1. Report Layout 5 points |
Extremely well structured and organized report; use of professional language; report template has been followed |
Well-structured and organized report; use of professional language; report template has been followed |
Structured and organised report; use of language is appropriate; template has been followed |
Structured and organised report; use of language could be improved; template has been followed partially |
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow; language needs to be proofread plenty of errors; template has not been used |
| C2. Abstract 5 points |
The abstract provides an insight of the article; the abstract is crisp; written extremely well |
The abstract provides an insight of the article; the abstract is crisp; written very well |
The abstract provides an insight of the article; written well |
The abstract provides an insight of the article |
The abstract is vague and difficult to follow; the abstract is not written well at all |
| C3. Introduction 5 points |
The introduction is well rounded and provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets an excellent flow for the report |
The introduction provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets a good flow for the report |
The introduction provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets the flow for the report |
The introduction could relate more to the assessment |
The introduction does not relate to the assessment and does not set the flow for the assessment |
| C4. Literature Review 15 points |
The literature review provides an in-depth analysis of 5 published articles/conference papers in the area; the literature review is extremely well written |
The literature review provides an in-depth analysis of 5 published articles/conference papers in the area; the literature review is well written and |
The literature review provides an in-depth analysis of the published literature in the area; the literature provides an insight of the area |
The literature review provides an analysis of the published literature |
The literature review lacks depth and detail; the literature review fails to provide a critique |
14
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| and provides a clear insight of the area |
provides a clear insight of the area |
||||
| C4. Evaluate 10 points |
The section provides an excellent evaluation of the performance; a well-rounded evaluation against the existing techniques |
The section provides a good evaluation of the performance; a good evaluation against the existing techniques |
The section provides a good evaluation of the performance; an evaluation against the existing techniques |
An evaluation of the performance is somewhat provided |
The evaluation of the performance has not been carried out; very little analysis is provided |
| C4. Conclusion 5 points |
Provided an excellent summary of the assessment, covering all aspects of the assessment |
Provided a good summary of the assessment, covering most aspects of the assessment |
Provided a summary of the assessment; somewhat covered the aspects of the assessment |
Provided a summary of the assessment. |
The conclusions failed to summarise the assessment |
| C4. References 5 points |
The references followed IEEE Style; the references were cited and complete |
The references followed IEEE Style; most the references were cited and complete |
Most references followed IEEE Style; some of the references were cited and complete |
Most references followed IEEE Style; the references were not cited |
The references did not follow IEEE Style and were not cited and incomplete |
15
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Assessment 3: Major Assignment
Overview
| Weight | Length | Due date | ULO |
| 30% | 2500 Words | Session 12 Sunday 11:55 PM | ULO1-ULO4 |
Introduction
Students must develop and design a wireless corporate network for a university in this assessment. You must undertake a requirement analysis and
understand the site, including the infrastructure and any line-of-sight difficulties, to design the corporate network. Because some facilities hold sensitive data,
additional attention must be taken when implementing wireless connections. Furthermore, because the university has a hospital, wireless devices and
channels may cause medical equipment to malfunction. You must pay close attention to limiting radio frequencies in and around the emergency room area
to minimise any interference.
Task
You are working as a wireless consultant for Mahnoor Solutions. One of the client of Mahnoor solutions want help with building and implementing a secure
wireless networking solution for their building. The building layout of their client is given in Fig. 1. You must suggest about the number of access points they
should be using, the proper location to install those antenna in the building. For instance, what should be the appropriate location for the antenna (balcony
or entrances) so that the indoor users should also get the acceptable signal quality. Moreover, the client organization has 100 employees working on 9
different floors and for different reasons they can go to different floors and would like to have connectivity for their endpoints on all those floors. The report
also wants you to suggest the Wi-Fi channel for them because some of the Wi-Fi channel are crowded and the signals get degraded due to the interference
from other users in the proximity.
The assessment requires you to plan and design a wireless network for the client making a short report for the justification of your choice for different
locations of the antenna and to use specific Wi-Fi channel within the building.
Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style.
16
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Figure 1: Client Building
Submission Instructions
All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be set up in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these dropboxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of session 12 Sunday 11:55PM.
The Turnitin similarity score will be used in determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites, Journal articles,
online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit your assessments to the appropriate
drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you will have a chance to change your assessment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior
to the submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed you cannot make re-submissions.
17
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
Please Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at the rate of 10% of the assessment final grade per day including
weekends.
Marking Guide: 100 Marks
| Task | Description | Marks |
| Report Layout | The report style, language and structure should be appropriate. | 5 |
| Introduction | This section should include a few sentences which provide an outline of the assessment. | 5 |
| Requirement Analysis | Analyse and discuss requirements of the university, including the functional and non-functional requirements of the wireless enterprise network. |
15 |
| Network Design | A comprehensive network design needs to be provided, covering all the buildings and open areas of the university. The network design needs to include all the networking devices, equipment and connections. The network is required to be designed in any industry tool. |
20 |
| Critical Analysis | The students are required to provide a critical analysis of the design of the network, the analysis should be in depth and detailed. The critical analysis should provide reasoning for the selection of the network devices and the design. |
10 |
| Constraint and Limitations | The constraints and limitations of the enterprise network need to be discussed. A workaround needs to be discussed and the effect of the constraints and limitations need to be explored. |
10 |
| Conclusion | Conclude with your opinion about the results. | 5 |
| References | Follow the IEEE style | 5 |
Marking criteria/Rubric
You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:
| Assessment criteria | Exceptional >=80% | Admirable 70% – 79% | Creditable 60% – 69% | Acceptable 50% – 59% | Unsatisfactory <=49% |
18
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| C1. Report Layout 5 points |
Extremely well structured and organized report; use of professional language; report template has been followed |
Well-structured and organized report; use of professional language; report template has been followed |
Structured and organised report; use of language is appropriate; template has been followed |
Structured and organised report; use of language could be improved; template has been followed partially |
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to follow; language needs to be proofread plenty of errors; template has not been used |
| C2. Introduction 5 points |
The introduction is well rounded and provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets an excellent flow for the report |
The introduction provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets a good flow for the report |
The introduction provides a brief description of the assessment; the introduction sets the flow for the report |
The introduction could relate more to the assessment |
The introduction does not relate to the assessment and does not set the flow for the assessment |
| C3. Requirement Analysis 15 points |
The requirement analysis is in depth and detailed; all requirements of the university have been considered; the functional and nonfunctional requirements explained extremely well. |
The requirement analysis is in depth and detailed; most requirements of the university have been considered; the functional and nonfunctional requirements explained well. |
The requirement analysis is provided; most requirements of the university have been considered; the functional and nonfunctional requirements are explained. |
A requirement analysis has been carried out; some functional and nonfunctional requirements discussed |
A requirement analysis has not been carried out; briefly discussed the requirements |
19
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| C3. Network Design 20 points |
The network design covers all areas of the university; the network design is clear and easy to understand; the network is extremely well designed with an industry tool |
The network design covers all areas of the university; the network design is clear; the network is well designed with an industry tool |
The network design covers most areas of the university; the network is well designed with an industry tool |
The network is designed with an industry tool and covers most areas of the network |
The network is not designed with an industry tool; The network design seems incomplete and does not cover all areas |
| C4. Critical Analysis 10 points |
Provided an excellent critical analysis with focus of the design of the network; the critical analysis provided great reasoning for the selection of the networking devices and the design |
Provided a good critical analysis with focus of the design of the network; the critical analysis provided reasonable reasoning for the selection of the networking devices and the design |
Provided a reasonable critical analysis with focus of the design of the network; the critical analysis provided reasonable reasoning for the selection of the networking devices and the design |
The critical analysis focused on the design of the network; somewhat reasoning provided |
The critical analysis lacks depth and detail; the critical analysis did not cover the limitations of the proposed wireless devices |
| C4. Constraints and Limitations 10 points |
The constraints and limitations explained extremely well; a workaround the constraints and limitations are provided; the effect of the constraints and limitations discussed |
The constraints and limitations explained very well; a workaround the constraints and limitations are provided; the effect of the constraints and limitations discussed |
An explanation of the constraints and limitations is provided; a workaround the constraints and limitations are provided; the effect of the constraints and limitations discussed |
An explanation of the constraints and limitations is provided; a brief workaround discussed |
The constraints and limitations are hardly explained, a workaround not discussed; the effects have not been highlighted |
20
Victorian Institute of Technology www.vit.edu.au CRICOS Provider No. 02044E, RTO No: 20829
| C5. Conclusion 5 points |
Provided an excellent summary of the assessment; covering all aspects of the assessment |
Provided a good summary of the assessment; covering most aspects of the assessment |
Provided a summary of the assessment; somewhat covered the aspects of the assessment |
Provided a summary of the assessment. |
The conclusions failed to summarise the assessment |
| C6. References 5 points |
The references followed IEEE Style; the references were cited and complete |
The references followed IEEE Style; most the references were cited and complete |
Most references followed IEEE Style; some of the references were cited and complete |
Most references followed IEEE Style; the references were not cited |
The references did not follow IEEE Style and were not cited and incomplete |