Subject Learning Guide_ Semester 1 2023 Page 13 of 14
Assessment Task 2: Analysis of an organisation ethical scenario (30%)
| Criteria | A 80-100% | B 70-79% | C 60-69% | D 50-59% | N 0-49% |
| Fulfilment of overall task intent and structure (10 marks) |
Sophisticated concepts communicated through advanced use of technique. Exceeds or refines the basic task requirements. Structure and sequence are used effectively to help integrate ideas or support logical argument. Soundly structured throughout. |
Material presented is strongly linked to task; comprehension of task is high. Ideas are sequenced in a logically satisfying way; connections between different themes or sections are well made. |
Sound conceptual development, problems encountered have been satisfactorily solved, resulting in well presented work. Sequence and structure are logical and easy to follow. Introductory and concluding sections used effectively. |
Broadly completed but some parts are superficially treated, misunderstood, or nearly overlooked. Well enough structured to make sense; could be better organised and more tightly focused upon the topic. Instances of irrelevance or confusion. |
Not completed: numerous parts are superficially treated, misunderstood, or overlooked. Poorly structured, does not make sense; needs assistance to be better organised and focused upon the topic. Too much irrelevance or confusion. |
| Application of theories &/or concepts dealt with in the topic or unit (10 marks) |
Creative or reflective processing of theories; understanding of how and why they are used; critical and evaluative thinking. |
Critical or evaluative thinking about how concepts/theories are applied; little inaccuracy or misunderstanding. |
Relevant concepts, etc. applied in a generally appropriate and thoughtful way. No major misunderstandings; logical connections between ideas; no serious omissions. |
Generally, very limited application; some misunderstanding or quite superficial treatment. |
Inadequate or no application; misunderstanding or extremely superficial treatment. |
| Critical Thinking (10 marks) |
Authoritative use of business ethics theories and concepts in the report. Clearly states the purpose, assertion, arguments and findings, and supports this with evidence in a sustained and logical fashion. |
Proficient use of business ethics theories and concepts and orders ideas in a structured and sequenced fashion, aimed at making a central argument or assertion. |
Competent use of business ethics theories and concepts. Contains many relevant ideas and attempts to structure them in a coherent manner. |
Limited use of appropriate business ethics theories and concepts. Contains some relevant ideas but is unable to relate them in an organised manner. |
Contains little or no meaningful information relating to the task and makes no attempt to produce an organised response to the task. |