| MGT5PSC: Assessment3 marking rubric | |||||
| CRITERIA | Excellent (> 80 %) | Very good (70 – 79%) | Good (60 – 69%) | Acceptable (50 – 59%) |
Unacceptable (<50%) |
| Demonstration of Google Site (10% of total mark) |
☐ Demonstrates a w ell-prepared Google Sites, precisely follow ing the instructions, and including a brief w alk-through of the key areas. (8-10 marks) |
☐ Demonstrates a w ell prepared Google Sites, follow ing the instructions, and including a brief w alk-through of the key areas. (7 marks) |
☐ Demonstrates a good Google Sites, mostly follow ing the instructions, and including a brief w alk through of the key areas. (6 marks) |
☐ Demonstrates a Google Sites, but key instructions not follow ed, or some areas missing. (5 marks) |
☐ No demonstration of Google Sites, or very rudimentary Sites prepared. (<5 marks) |
| Introduction to chosen company (10% of total mark) |
☐ Provides a clear and succinct introduction about the chosen company and the rational for its selection. (8-10 marks) |
☐ Provides a clear introduction about the chosen company and the rational for its selection. (7 marks) |
☐ Provides a good introduction about the chosen company and the rational for its selection. (6 marks) |
☐ Provides an introduction about the chosen company. (5 marks) |
☐ Missing introduction about the chosen company (<5 marks) |
| Report on progress for tasks (40% of total mark) |
☐ Reports on progress on both supply- and operations-related tasks, explaining how the tasks is proceeding and provides a compelling summary of analysis. (32-40 marks) |
☐ Reports on progress on both supply- and operations related tasks, explaining how the tasks is proceeding and provides a good summary of analysis. (28-31 marks) |
☐ Reports on progress on both supply- and operations related tasks, w ith an adequate summary of analysis. (24-27 marks) |
☐ Reports on progress on only one task, OR Reports on both tasks but w ithout an adequate summary of analysis. (20-23 marks) |
☐ Little or no progress on analytical tasks, OR Progress on analytical tasks missing from presentation. (<20 marks) |
| Challenges & strategies to address these (20% of total mark) |
☐ Identifies top three challenges faced in completing the assessment tasks, and proposes realistic and relevant strategies to address these challenges. (16-20 marks) |
☐ Identifies top three challenges faced in completing the assessment tasks, and proposes good strategies to address these challenges. (14-15 marks) |
☐ Identifies top three challenges faced in completing the assessment tasks, and attempts to propose strategies to address these challenges. (12-13 marks) |
☐ Identifies some challenges faced in completing the tasks, but fails to propose strategies to address these challenges. (10-11 marks) |
☐ Little or no attempt to identify or report on challenges. (<10 marks) |
| CONTINUED OVER PAGE…. |
| Presentation skills (20% of total mark) |
☐ Excellent presentation, explaining all items clearly and confidently. Includes visual demonstration of relevant sites and/or w ork in progress. Excellent video and voice quality. Adheres to 5 minute time limit. (16-20 marks) |
☐ Very good presentation, explaining all items clearly. Includes visual demonstration of relevant sites and/or w ork in progress. Very good video and voice quality. Adheres to 5 minute time limit. (14-15 marks) |
☐ Good presentation, explaining all items. Includes visual demonstration of relevant sites and/or w ork in progress. Good video and voice quality. Adheres to 5 minute time limit. (12-13 marks) |
☐ Adequate presentation, explaining most items. Includes visual demonstration of sites and/or w ork in progress. Fair video and voice quality. (10-11 marks) |
☐ Poor presentation, failing to explain all items clearly. Fails to visual demonstration of relevant sites and/or w ork in progress. Poor video and voice quality. (< 10 marks) |