she would have delivered a bit of reason why she chose that topic, only little information wasHuman Computer Interaction delivered on the introduction part, moreover in the second slide only classification was shown and other more information was delivered.3

Well articulation of concept was perfect good from her side every slide was linked to each other. She covered almost every idea she could.5

she has covered most of contents which are relevant to her topic. She has also delivered a bit of background information which supports theme of research topic as well.4

Overall, Every slides were perfectly linked to each other. Which made the presentation more interesting well.5

she would have delivered more definition of some technical terms so that the viewer can understand what the process includes what that means.3

Well with the references everything was good. she picked the same image from the reference instead which would have picked other interesting relevant images.3

There were few mistakes I found a bit of interaction with viewer was missing. quality of video was perfect, moreover in Turnitin report it was good that only reference was getting matched. Rest of the information was self-made Which is amazing.4

i liked the presentation, topic was good, and it was something new for me, i understood the some of part of it like the benefits and limitations.3

she met most of the criteria required in the presentation. She delivered every relevant information related to her topic. Still there are some minor improvements like only 8 slides were there and more information was getting delivered.4

Overall, she delivered presentation in almost in professional way, a Bit of pause were needed while explaining the topic so that the viewers would understand bit more of it. she would have captured more attention if she would have added some animations so that the presentation would look more better.